Kieler: Smoking ban offers only positives

Recent efforts to enact a state-wide smoking ban in Kansas have faced harsh opposition from the Kansas Chamber of Commerce and Kansas business owners. The bill, which would ban smoking in public places such as businesses, bars and restaurants in Kansas, is being fought on the grounds that it unfairly rejects smokers’ right to smoke and that it will have a negative impact on business. These arguments are unfair and inadequate when stacked against the health benefits of enacting the ban.

There are many reasons it’s unlikely that a statewide smoking ban would significantly affect restaurants and bars. Customers who smoke would not relocate just to be closer to pro-smoking facilities. Even those who live on a Kansas border would be more likely to consider food, liquor specials and costs before smoking options across the state line.

The proposed smoking ban in Kansas is not a battle against businesses or smokers.

Businesses concerned about losing customers would need only to invest in a smoking porch and heated torch lamps to become smoker-friendly hotspots. And visiting individuals who had previously avoided smoky environments might enhance business. Non-smokers do make up a majority of the U.S. population.

The proposed ban is not a discriminatory act to deny smokers’ freedom. It simply considers the effect of smoke in public places with the fact that most Americans do not smoke.

The scientific phenomenon of particle dispersion means that there is no such thing as a smoking section and a non-smoking section — it all becomes the same . One could argue that by not enacting a smoking ban, non-smokers are being denied their right to clean air. Smoky environments are particularly harmful for individuals who do not smoke for health reasons, such as those with respiratory and coronary conditions.

Numerous studies have shown that smoke is not just a nuisance. The unavoidable fact is that smoking is a dangerous and potentially deadly activity. Cigarette smoke, which contains cancer-causing chemicals, is linked to a multitude of diseases and health issues and affects nonsmokers as well as smokers.

According to the American Lung Association, nearly 3,000 nonsmokers die annually from lung cancer caused by secondhand smoke.

The proposed smoking ban in Kansas is not a battle against businesses or smokers. Businesses wouldn’t face significant financial loss and could evolve to become smoker-friendly, and just because smokers have the right to smoke doesn’t give them the right to pollute a public space.

If the Kansas Senate passes the bill, it makes a decision to improve state health statistics.

The Kansas smoking ban would benefit the majority of Americans who choose not to smoke and would set a positive example of health for future generations.

— Alison Kieler for the editorial board

 

Related articles

Letter: Why I’m against the statewide smoking ...

Tactics employed by anti-smoking advocates turn

/news/2009/apr/21/letter_why_im/

Editorial: Students should support smoking ban

Smokers and nonsmokers alike should support a statewide smoking ban in public ...

/news/2010/mar/04/editorial-smoking-ban/

Lawrence smoking ban may become statewide

Smoking ban may soon be statewide, business owners fear customer decline. Statistics ...

/news/2007/feb/06/smoking/

Editorial: Statewide smoking ban would benefit Kansans

Health benefits alone are enough to warrant a ban.

/news/2009/apr/17/editorial_statewide/

State bill could end local smoking ban

New legislation would overturn the long-established non-smoking ordinance in Lawrence.

/news/2010/feb/09/local-smoking-ban/

Brown: Smoking ban should pass

Secondhand smoke is especially bad for those with asthma.

/news/2009/oct/20/brown-smoking-ban/

Health Authority wants state smoking ban

The Kansas Health Policy Authority proposed a 50 cent per pack user ...

/news/2007/nov/06/health_authority_wants_state_smoking_ban/

Gentry: Blowing smoke

Student smokers continue to ignore restrictions across campus, putting others at risk. ...

/news/2007/mar/02/gentry/

McNaughton: Smokers refuse to acknowledge health problems

I still don’t understand because smokers smell and taste terrible.

/news/2008/mar/27/mcnaughton/

Changes to smoking ban could affect local ...

State law will ban smoking within 10 feet of doorways and windows.

/news/2010/jun/14/changes-smoking-ban-could-affect-businesses/

Seeing Through the Smoke

For years, we've seen the Surgeon General's warning on cigarette packs. But ...

/news/2012/feb/29/seeing-smoke/

/comments/cr/33/11652/#c8302

House passes state-wide smoking ban bill

The vote came in Thursday in favor of banning smoking in Kansas.

/news/2010/feb/26/house-passes-state-wide-smoking-ban-bill/

Syring: Smoking ban should be upheld

The owner of two local bars filed a lawsuit against Lawrence in ...

/news/2007/may/04/syring/

Letter: A single glass kills more tha ...

Alcohol abuse causes more damage than cigarette use.

/news/2009/apr/21/letter_single_glass/

Letter to editor: ‘No Smoking’ signs

Marcoux: Smokers need to pay attention to signs.

/news/2009/sep/22/letter_editor_no_smoking_signs/

/comments/cr/33/12003/#c8719

/comments/cr/33/10514/#c7161

Lighting up en masse

The lethal addiction behind social smoking

/news/2009/jan/29/lighting_en_masse/

Regan: Smoking taboo doesn't fly abroad

Smoking in Ireland more acceptable than in U.S.

/news/2009/jun/24/regans/

Local smokers face further restrictions

Bill mandates outdoor smokers be 10 feet away from restaurant doors and ...

/news/2010/apr/20/local-smokers-face-further-restrictions/

/comments/cr/33/10460/#c6948

/comments/cr/33/1229/#c537

/comments/cr/33/13779/#c10252

E-cigs provide no-smoke option

Electronic cigarettes use a liquid nicotine and offer a variety of flavors.

/news/2010/may/05/e-cigs-provide-no-smoke-option/

/comments/cr/33/11888/#c8553

/comments/cr/33/12003/#c8714

Editorial: Tobacco tax, decrease deficit

Editorial board discusses the benefits of raising the tobacco tax.

/news/2009/oct/08/editorial-tobacco-tax/

Smokers feel the heat of rising price

Legislature consider tax on tobacco for revenue.

/news/2009/sep/25/tobacco/

Hookah could be on its way out ...

Studies squash long-time myths about shisha smoke.

/news/2009/oct/08/hookah-out-door/

/comments/cr/33/10514/#c7173

Editorial: Smoking Laws Need to be Enforced

Smokers outside of building entrances frustrate students. School policies need to be ...

/news/2012/mar/29/editorial-smoking-laws-need-be-enforced/

Puff the Magic Hooka

/news/2006/may/04/jp_puffthemagichuka/

Letter to the Editor: Anti-smoking scare tactics ...

After reading the commentary piece by Cassie Gentry, I got a little ...

/news/2007/mar/05/lettertoeditor/

Group tries to raise tobacco awareness

Health educators have chalked out smoke-free boundaries on campus for the Great ...

/news/2009/nov/19/group-tries-raise/

Lytton: Women pay price for biased insurance ...

Practice of gender rating makes women dig deeper into their pockets for ...

/news/2010/apr/05/lytton-women/

Graphic labels for tobacco products blocked by ...

An anti-smoking initiative by the Food and Drug Administration was blocked by ...

/news/2011/nov/07/graphic-labels-blocked/

Local bars now building patios

The city commission recently approved a new patio for the Jackpot Music ...

/news/2009/jun/20/patios/

Shorman: Smoking ban strips student rights

Banning sale of tobacco on campus is about more than blowing smoke.

/news/2010/feb/03/shorman-smoking/

/comments/cr/28/724/#c9777

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment