Monday, October 8, 2007
Student Senate Finance Committee questioned how to use the Multicultural Education Fund on Wednesday after the Multicultural Education Fund board met for the first time this year. The debate focused on whether funds should be supplemental or primary for multicultural groups and events.
Senate rules and regulations specifies that the Multicultural Education Fund can fund up to 25 percent over $1,000, in addition to the 50 percent over $1,000 that Student Senate can fund a event or group. Rules and Regulations do not state whether multicultural groups or events should seek primary funds from Student Senate or primary funds from the Multicultural Education Fund board.
pullquote
I think it’s already hindered business. It’s great to have if it’s used right.
-Ray Wittlinger, Olathe senior and student body vice president
The Multicultural Education Fund, currently consisting of about $70,000, was created in April 2006 after University of Kansas students voted on a referendum. The vote increased student fees by $1.50 per fall and spring semesters and 75 cents for the summer semester to provide additional funding for multicultural groups and events on campus. The University then created the Multicultural Education Fund board, which consisted of four members of the Multicultural Resource Center and four student senators representing the Finance Committee, University Affairs Committee, Student Rights’ Committee and Multicultural Affairs Committee, that met no less than once a month to determine which groups or events received funds.
Some senators think Senate rules and regulations are unclear about whether multicultural groups should go to Senate or the MCEF Board first if they need funding.
Austin Kelly, Lawrence senior and student body treasurer, said that this was not made clear in the referendum or by the Student Executive Committee when it wrote the Board into Rules and Regulations.
“The referendum was written by StudEx last summer, and it was thrown together,” Kelly said. “This should have been done last year. This should have been over.”
Kelly said that he did not have an opinion on whether the funding should be primary or supplemental.
“The most important thing is that the MCEF Board needs to fund things that Senate can’t,” Kelly said.
Kelly said that he was concerned the board would only be used by groups such as the Black Student Union and Hispanic American Leadership Organization. He said he was afraid those groups, along with a couple of other large minority organizations, would drain the Fund.
Hannah Love, Dodge City senior, student body president and one of the original authors of the referendum, said that the fund was intended to be supplemental, and this was clearly written in Student Senate rules and regulations.
“A lot of the uproar is confusion,” Love said. “People think they’re double dipping, but they’re not.”
Love also said that the Multicultural Resource Center had engaged in outreach to prevent the funds from only going to one group.
Michael Wade Smith, Goodland freshman and Finance Committee representative on the MCEF board, said that groups needed to be told where to go first to receive funding.
“That fund should be a supplemental fund. They should be able to come and double dip,” Smith said. “Finance just doesn’t want that group to be another finance committee.”
Ray Wittlinger, Olathe senior and student body vice president, said he thought the fund was intended to be supplemental. He also said that he understood the confusion senators had over the issue, and that a consensus needed to be reached this year about how to approach the funds.
“I think it’s already hindered business,” Wittlinger said. “It’s great to have if it’s used right.”
Love said that executive members of Senate needed to sit down with committees to clarify Appendix N, which was the section of rules and regulations devoted to the Multicultural Education Fund Board. She also said it was up to senators to make sure the confusion did not delay Senate business.
“It’s their own fault,” Love said. “They need to sit down and read Appendix N.”
— Edited by Kaitlyn Syring
Student Senate Notebook
Here is what happened at the Student Senate meeting on Wednesday
Senate Notebook: March 6, 2008
Here's what Student Senate discussed at last night's meeting.
Senator to address violations
At tonight’s meeting, Mason Heilman, Student Rights Committee chair, will face violations ...
Student groups need new way to pay ...
The executive committee of the Student Senate passed a resolution to stop ...
Senate rule accidentally omitted
The requirement for senators to submit event surveys for funding evaluation was ...
Senators question student body president’s vetoes
The vetoed legislation concerns Gmail technology, a sustainability fee and the Multiculural ...
Student Senate works issues for this semester, ...
Many issues are works in progress right now for the Senate
Editorial Board: Athletic funding shouldn't fall on ...
The Women and Non-Revenue Sports fee was voted to be increased from ...
Pork politics
New rules for funding make process more ...
If a student group is seeking more than $500 in support, there ...
Groups must detail fund proposals
Student Senate looks closer at funding requests after a decrease in the ...
Senate Notebook
Full Senate met last night and voted on several pieces of legislation, ...
Student Senate Finance Committee will update, clarify ...
The Finance Committee hopes to clarify rules like those about the student ...
Student groups benefit financially from having student ...
Senators say that every group has access to funds, but admit that ...
Student Senate in full swing
Members discuss funding, parliamentary procedures and other issues to tackle at their ...
Student Senate dismisses senator, sends bill back ...
Full Student Senate met last night and dismissed one senator because of ...
Student Senate Notebook
Student Senate committees met last night to vote on legislation concerning large ...
Referendums have a second chance
After the transportation referendums failed to meet the requirements for an official ...
Student senators tour new center
Plans for the new Sabatini Multicultural Resource Center have been in the ...
Editorial: Senate must use funds wisely
Student Senate has shown more prudence this year, but must continue its ...
Senate considers fee increases
The fees have not been implemented yet.
Campus elections 2009: Students of Liberty
A more sustainable campus, creating separation of power within Student Senate are ...
Committee advances funding bill for group
Student Senate finance committee allocates $12,403 to Black Student Union for conference ...
Student Senate to vote on fee increases
The Student Recreation and Fitness Center, Parking Department, Watkins Memorial Health Center, ...
Know your Student Senate candidates
Learn more about the candidates for Student Senate
Student Senate notebook
Student Senate votes on several bills for ...
The session lasted two hours with the debates of fund distribution.
Student Senate reviewing fees
To keep overall fees the same, some individual fees will have to ...
Student fees to increase
Some of the funds will pay for additional staff at the Multicultural ...
Senate finalizes funding recommendations
Some student organizations will see increases or decreases in budget.
Senate says spending is business as usual
Student Senate has spent 30 percent of its budget after two sessions.
Committee discuses student fee increase
The rising cost of fuel and other products along with the desire ...
Student Senate Notebook
Student senators voted to increase fees for campus transportation and SUA, and ...
Student Senate notebook: Funds may be used ...
Student organizations with selective membership may qualify for free advertising in the ...
Student Senate approves group funding
More than $100,00 will fund more than 70 student groups next year.
Editorial: Election scandals are ‘unsettling’
Recent allegations that surfaced against student body politicians are unsettling and petty. ...
Student Senate profile
Ray Wittlinger is the student body vice-president.
Campus fees generate more than $20 million
Student Senate finance committee reviews funds to determine what will might face ...
Senate elects officers for committees
Senators were chosen to lead finance, rights, multi-cultural affairs, and university affairs ...
Fee continues amid controversy
Senate votes to continue $80-a-year charge to subsidize KU athletics budget.
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Multicultural groups confused about funding
As a quotee in this article I would like to amend amisquote. "Double dipping" is not the purpose of this fund. The STUDENTS of the University of Kansas voted for a referendum that would create a fee to expand the amount of Multicultural programs and activities that would be seem on campus. From that fee we get the Multicultural Education Fund. It is not double dipping, it is the use of a fee that the students voted on to provide a campus that needs more multicultural awareness with more opportunities to gain it.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID