Thursday, September 13, 2007
Stay the course. It’s a simple and short statement that retains power. Stay the course. A statement that says to not falter, to not buckle under the pressure and to not fall into that category with all the other weaklings. Stay the course. Be strong and persistent. Never give up. Stay the course.
While I admit that “stay the course” is good advice in many situations, it is not always used justly. Recently, I watched the movie “The Patriot.” It’s a movie about the American Revolution and their war for independence against the British. I know the movie was written in 2000, but sure enough, whenever the future looked bleak, the American soldiers would just plead, “Stay the course.” I guess that would be good advice in this situation because we eventually won our freedom. Sometimes, when I’m really down about being in debt because college is so expensive and I’m so frustrated with everything, I just feel like dropping out of school. I have to tell myself, “No, Jesse, stay the course. It will be better in the end. Just stay the course.” And that statement reinvigorates and compels me to stay in school and work harder. But really, is “stay the course” a good motivational statement for America’s war in Iraq?
Why isn’t recognizing one’s fault a strength? Why do we have to persist in winning, heeding no attention to the possible outcomes, positive or negative? If we did, wouldn’t that be a giant leap for mankind? I know America loves its winners, but some of the best sports movies end with the protagonist or protagonists losing. However, through all their struggles, they learn something about themselves. They walk away with a clearer image of themselves and begin to move on and head in the right direction. They recognize their faults and where they screwed up, but instead of being stubborn and arrogant about it, they come to terms with it and improve upon themselves. If I saw this in a leader, I would blindly follow him or her, because only a real man or woman would have such humility. But to constantly use that statement during the course of the war in Iraq was irresponsible and a complete misuse of such a statement.
I, for one, do not support the war in Iraq. I support our troops but it makes me angry of the deceit that brought us into this war. President George W. Bush and his administration proclaimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. To this day, no weapons have been discovered in Iraq. This war has had no good results other than ending a tyrant’s oppressive regime. But now we’re stuck in Iraq and this is the part where I’m torn. I want the troops to come home, but I have this notion that as America, we shouldn’t abandon those who want our help. That wouldn’t be very humanitarian of us, would it? The last time we isolated ourselves from the world, Hitler rose in power and nearly took over all of Europe. The only problem is that only half the people in Iraq want our help and the others wants us to leave. Should we stay the course? This is a question I just cannot seem to answer. I’m not adept in politics so I have no answers or solutions for this problem. All I know is that I want peace.
Brown is a Lee’s Summit, Mo., junior in journalism.
Guest Column: Diagnosing Iraq
There isn't a more complicated issue in the world right now than ...
The Iraq War
The two candidates offer different views on the Iraq War.
New Joint Chiefs Chairman visits Leavenworth
Newly Appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen ...
Schumaker: Cinema glorifies Confederacy
Films often feature Confederate protagonists, but Union protagonists are lacking.
Bennett: Freeing Libya and the world is ...
Congrats on your "freedom," Libyans, but Obama's war on Libya was unconstitutional ...
ROTC protocol to remain unchanged
Despite the news that the military will be sending 20,000 additional troops ...
McLeod: War hits home
Iraq conflict is personal for Marine’s fiance
Guest Column: As it continues, the Iraq ...
Sustained combat, lack of foreseeable end offer grim prospects for the future
Minster: Military activity should be voluntary
Draft damages morale and hurts efficiency.
Losing sight of Baghdad
Sniper’s shot takes soldier’s vision but not his loyalty to the men ...
The realities of the military
A lack of exposure to the military creates dissonance between the perceptions ...
Doctoral student shares experiences in Iraq
Major Andrew Harvey spent the duration of 2006 in Iraq working to ...
Student veterans react to Afghanistan troop withdrawal
About 33,000 troops will return home by August 2012.
Editorial Board: Iraq’s success dependent own government
When all is said and done, the government set up in Iraq ...
Editorial: Boyda has shown genuine progress
Scott: Everyone deserves credit, even Bush
The Party of No is more flexible than they appear.
Schumaker: This anniversary, remember the Civil War ...
Southerners often forget that slavery was the major cause of the Civil ...
Guest: The Image of Kennedy, the shadow ...
Letter to the editor: A disappointing sham
President Obama has failed to keep campaign promises.
Several campus groups offer veterans help
Veterans benefit from some campus groups, while other areas of care are ...
Morning Brew: Sports not life or death, ...
Hirschfeld: Young teens disrupt entire movie theater
When I paid $7.50 to see a movie, I didn't realize I'd ...
Brown: Despite national title, Lawrence still lacks
Lawrence needs to rise to the occasion and become the best college ...
Letter to the Editor: Iraqi deaths matter
It is newsworthy because it is a significant loss of human life, ...
Deployment life and student life differ wildly ...
KU student veterans must adjust to calmer lifestyle after service ends.
Movies to watch for in 2009
A sneak peak at next year's blockbusters and busts
Brown: Harry Potter's spell is powerful
Why the boy wizard's epic story is one for the ages
Notes from Election 2008
Kansan staff members attend a Barack Obama event in Kansas City on ...
Forum series offer student insight on war ...
The Dole Institute of Politics invites experts on the Irag war to ...
Politically Correct: More troops to Afghanistan
Three columnists give their insights on sending more troops to Afghanistan.
To hell and back
A fight outside Naismith Hall began Thor Nystrom's year-long journey into the ...
Crowning glory
How one beauty queen balances pageant and student life.
Students to soldiers
Facing possible deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan after graduation, 81 University students ...
KU vets see potential in Obama administration
Veterans at the University hope Obama’s and his cabinet picks can bring ...
Cruise at War
A look at KU's changing face of ...
University's turbulent past has evolved into a somewhat tranquil state of activism.
Big 12 Media Day: Overview of Big ...
See how next Football seasons looks before it starts.
George H.W. Bush receives award, answers questions ...
The former president visited the University to receive the Robert J. Dole ...
Shouting protesters no better than Ann Coulter’s ...
What gives you the willies?
Are your phobias controlling your life?
From left: Kimberlee Hinkle, Libby Johnson and Hannah ...
1 comment
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
Comments
Brown: ‘Staying the course’ not always an option
This author is horridly naive. Our occupation of Iraq is simply for the oil. It took the US economy 25 years to recover from the first oil crisis during the early 70's. During that period one barrel of crude oil spiked at $70 (in today's dollars). Today, oil is at $80 a barrel. But, if the US does not secure access to the oil fields in Iraq, one barrel could easily spike to $150 or $200 dollars a barrel. This would equate to making gasoline $8 or $9 dollars a gallon. This would devistate the US economy. Does the author understand the amount of human suffering that would take place with double digit inflation and double digit unemployment? I think not. Thus, this author has proven himself another casuality to the mindless, muttering, peacenik milquetoasts.
The only real discussion is how the US is going to develop alternative fuels.
Brown: ‘Staying the course’ not always an option
quote
"Well, Todd, how about instead of invading a sovereign country for oil (which, any other time, would be a practice we'd condemn), how about we put the billions and billions of dollars being flushed down the loo in Iraq, and the billions of dollars in tax credits for petrol companies, and put it towards R&D for alternatie fuels? "
... seems resonable to me. I never authorized this occupation, although I think most congressmen prefer solving our oil dependency while protecting the status quo (big oil, detroit, military contractors) at the same time. it seems to make them feel warm and fuzzy when they can serve the public and make money for the rich at the same time. this is nothing new. still, the oil in Iraq will not last forever.
to clarify, the Iraqi experience has been an occupation, not a war. the only sovereignty that was ever at stake was that of saddam hussein. his removal has given the people in Iraq a real chance for sovereignty. if the Norcal Mexican drug cartel stages a revolution and takes over the counry of Mexico, and the US intervenes and overthrows the cartel 20 years later, is the US guilty of ignoring the sovereignty of Mexico? tyrannical leaders and $600 gold-rimmed sunglasses does not give a nation sovereignty. the US has not expressed any interest in retaining political control in Irag, just retaining access to the oil.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID