Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” represents the latest effort by intelligent design (ID) advocates to refute evolutionary theory.
Hosted by Ben Stein, the film claims that educators and scientists are being persecuted for their belief that ID is evident in nature.
But instead of being an investigative inquiry that highlights the arguments, this film presents a ridiculous caricature of the scientific community bent on quashing free speech for the sake of protecting a failing ideology.
The audience is bombarded with images of the Berlin Wall, Holocaust mass graves and the downtrodden citizenry of totalitarian regimes. The result of the edited slices is a politicized rant that fails to note the vital distinction between Herbert Spencer’s long-discredited social darwinism and modern evolutionary theory as applied to the natural sciences and not human morality.
Stein, in his signature deadpan style, attempts to portray a group of disgruntled researchers as the victims of a Darwinian conspiracy for their roles in promoting ID instead of dealing with the real issue responsible for their professional failures — shoddy science. Curiously, “Expelled” does not even provide an adequate description of modern evolutionary theory, the very paradigm that is being contested in this film.
Perhaps the most important question that is never addressed in “Expelled” is whether or not ID is actually science. Stein argues that ID is being kept out of science curriculum in an attempt to stifle independent thought.
However, the ID program appeals to an unknown cosmic designer or supernatural power to explain biological variation, neither of which can be directly observed nor tested in an empirical fashion. Thus, ID is not science.
As much as Stein would like to tear down that ideological Berlin Wall he sees existing in academia, the wall needs to remain in order to keep ID and religious philosophies out of our science classrooms and laboratories.
—Mark Zlojutro, graduate student in the Laboratory of Biological Anthropology
Folmsbee: Don't 'believe' in evolution
Theory is something that is to be accepted.
Darwin debate remains amid celebrations
The University has arraged multiple events recognizing Darwin’s scientific impact in conjunction ...
Two theories of science debated
Kansas' evolution standards have hurt its reputation
The Kansas State Board of Education's stand in the evolution debate has ...
Reframing the worlds of art and science
Collaborations encourage students to garner new ways of learning these seemingly separate ...
Puliltzer Prize winner examines debate
Edward Humes’ new book ‘Monkey Girl’ tries to explain the evolutionary debate ...
Romanian artist’s work on display at Spencer
Molded by his experience in communist Romania, Dan Perjovschi uses simple cartoons ...
Faculty boycott hearings on evolution teachings
Biology of beetlejuice
KU professor will discuss her research on poisonous beetles in Africa
Greening it
"The 11th Hour" review
Microraptor replica develops dino theory
Gliding dinosaur model helps researchers develop a new theory on the origin ...
Folmsbee: A chiropractic reformation
Chiropractic must adjust ideology to be considered legitimate.
Letter: Economic views more important than evolutionary ...
Belief in evolution not specific to one party.
Student film hits international scene
Sandra Ristovska created a film about how globalization and modernization have affected ...
“A Prehistoric Adventure” premieres
National Geographic consulted University of Kansas science professors to ensure the dinosaurs ...
Creating a scene
More graduates of the University’s film program are staying in Lawrence, creating ...
God’s coming to campus!
Folmsbee: Darwin day recognizes evolution's importance
200 years after Darwin's birth, many Americans don't accept the theory of ...
Cohen: Let's make Kansas proud
State's response to abortion debate offers chance for redemption.
‘Tree of Life’ has roots in art, ...
Lied Center performance will unite culture and science with on-stage dance, theater, ...
Greening it
Your guide to greener living
Films depict life in Soviet Bloc
Eastern European film festival marks 20th anniversary of the fall of the ...
A question of identity
The Comanche Nation informed KU that a professor who claims he's Comanche ...
New exhibit shows importance of evolution
Grad check
See what's happened to William Adams since he graduated...
Former astronaut shares telescope knowledge
Professor Steve Hawley will deliver a lecture called “Wild Astronomy” tonight.
The science of attraction
Use Darwin as your wingman: Evolutionary theory unlocks the secrets to attraction.
Armstrong: What conservatives keep getting wrong
Barking up the evolution tree
Professors censured for plagiarism
On Oct. 4, the University cited two professors for academic misconduct.
Oberthaler: How voters can help the state ...
Professor to compose for Berlin Philharmonic
James Barnes was commissioned to write a piece for the Berlin Philharmonic ...
Saha: Leave the scientific terms in the ...
Music and films use science to capture the interest of the human ...
Short Stack
Seminar addresses global warming
A professor of science from Maine addressed the many theories to put ...
Folmsbee: Why can't we all get along?
Continued controversy in battle of religion vs. science isn't necessary.
Folmsbee: There will never be a cure ...
Claims that a cure for cancer will be discovered are unrealistic, but ...
Science and art unite in modern dance
Liz Lerman Dance Company’s performance explored issues surrounding genetic research.
Turtles crawl into class of their own
KU couple helps residents learn what slinks, hops and squirms in Kansas.
Research group studies fossils in Antarctica
A group of University research students gets its study of Antarctic fossils ...
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Letter: Intelligent design documentary fails to find science in concept
Frankly, really nice to hear someone from Kansas not praising Stein and his movie for a change.
As an evolutionary biologist, I know well the evidence for evolution and the lack of any testable hypotheses in Intelligent Design (which would make it science), and yet I would not have a problem teaching it in a science class. It would take 10-12 minutes altogether, would debunk it completely, and would even be a good way to explain what is required of a theory to be a scientific theory.
Letter: Intelligent design documentary fails to find science in concept
I'm not a scientist. While I've read more on physics, astronomy, paleontology, and biology than most people, I'm no true expert. As a result, I'm forced to stand on the shoulders of those who have done the research for me. But if you really feel, BjornOstman, that macro-evolution is a testable theory, then take that up with Dr. Craig Martin, head of evolutionary biology at KU. By nature of the theory of macro-evolution, one cannot observe it. Quite a bummer for a scientist huh? Now, Dr. Martin certainly feels that there's enough evidence for it, but you cannot prove macro-evolution in the way you can photosynthesis. Maybe you believe he's a quack for believing you can't prove macro-evolution. You would certainly be more qualified than I.
Stein (who's not a creationist by the way) is pointing out how many scientists are not being listened to for going against the status quo.
Also, Mr. Zlojutro fails to realize that modern evolutionary theory does have a huge impact on the understanding of human morality. But I can excuse him, since his philosophy class may have glossed over that.
Letter: Intelligent design documentary fails to find science in concept
Unfortunately, a lot of creationists feel that the theory of evolution is a direct attack on their beliefs and specifically the belief system put forth in the book of Genesis. When analyzing the words of the bible, we cannot think that descriptions given are entirely literal. The old testament was written in a time much more primitive than our own, and God would have known this when disseminating knowledge of the world to the human race at the time. God would have known that ideas of evolution, microprocessors, and DNA would have eluded even the most inquisitive, open-minded people of the time. The world has been laid out before us to study and draw inferences from, so trying to debunk evolution actually goes against our purpose on this planet. Intelligent Design is admittedly a clever way to disguise what is really a reactionary belief held by those who are unwilling to admit that current belief systems may not be adequate. Anyway, what's more intelligent, the creation of humans in seven literal days or a beautifully orchestrated evolution spanning billions of years?
Letter: Intelligent design documentary fails to find science in concept
Aerohawk has a point on the fact that Moses would have trouble understanding DNA and such, but God says that he can not lie. Not that he won't but that he can't. Therefore if He lied about creation then whose to say that he didn't lie about Jesus being His son or other keys to creationism. Therefore the theory of evolution is a direct attack on creationism.
Letter: Intelligent design documentary fails to find science in concept
The basic teleological argument for ID is nothing that can be considered rational, let alone scientific. There is much of the universe that is yet to be discovered by science itself, yet science does not make claims to know about it. Intelligent Design, however, postulates a creator of that very same unknown universe, and in doing so, it shows the irrationality behind its very argument. Proponents of ID claim that the anthropic principle and the fact that every organism is so well fashioned show a strong probability of a creator's existence. These claims are weak, and because we know such a small portion of the universe, we cannot use what we know to make claims on probabilities of the whole.
I, however, have to agree with BjornOstman. While I do believe claims for ID are lacking in evidence (and may be considered down right illogical and all together absurd at times), I do not see any harm in teaching it alongside evolution. It goes along the same lines as Dennet's proposed religion courses. Show the kids all sides, and what is known about them; consequently, the students will see which ones (if any at all) make the most sense. If nothing else, this could appease the creationists and proponents of ID, and they might finally fade into the back of the mind with Santa and Captain Planet.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID