Friday, February 22, 2008
History is full of government control mechanisms, when limitations are placed on individuals or societies for different reasons and justifications.
America was built on a democratic idea meant to minimize these mechanisms and their effects on the lives of its citizens, and, in doing so, increase freedom for the individual and — theoretically — the entire population.
Ironically, the two-party system that is popular in the United States that has grown out of this idea is proving to be a highly evolved example of a control mechanism.
The danger inherent in the two-party system lies not only in placing an enormous amount of power in fewer hands, but it also drastically reduces our options and limits our freedom.
Compare freedom to the rapid sophistication video games have undergone.
When I was a child, I was satisfied with moving my 64-bit Mario from left to right in a two-dimensional world, bonking his head on bricks for mushrooms and fire-flowers.
As technology and I have improved, my experience has evolved to include acquiring undreamt of amounts of freedom, in digital worlds where I can exist in lifelike situations, performing deeds of renown or unspeakable evil.
When I play the newer generation of games, I now have options: I can move Mario in any direction and make a broader range of choices. I can even wear different clothing.
But we’re still playing Mario, people.
The freedom of choice arises from our ability to choose among a number of options available.
The difference between having many options and only one is the difference between being free or not.
The assertion that a two-party democracy is a sham isn’t that radical an idea. It is simply a call for real democracy.
The form of democracy in the United States has become a parody of democracy; a farce, where all the actions, regulations and hand-raising signs of real democracy are present, but the beauty of the freedom to choose our own leaders is cheapened by falsely limiting our options to two political parties.
We are so enslaved to our comfort zone that any talk of a third party draws condemnation from citizens who mindlessly follow the status quo.
A two-party democracy is only one party away from fascism, especially when the actions of one party can’t be distinguished from the other.
On college campuses, where ideas like freedom and justice still bloom, the call for real democracy should sound the loudest.
Instead, the constituents furiously engage in the struggle to maintain the status quo in this age group.
I mourn the misplaced ideology of young idealists who believe change is imminent in the current system.
In four years, they’ll be jaded realists, and that’s the real tragedy.
I refuse to believe the American people are not diverse enough, multi-faceted enough or creative enough to have as the reflection of our will and fortitude a measly two organizations of questionable vitality and democratic merit.
That we allow ourselves to be so limited is astounding, if not downright shameful.
Anderson is a Perry senior in creative writing.
Anderson: Is our democracy healthy?
Third party candidates shake things up
Obama or McCain not speaking for you? Look at Nader or Barr.
Thompson: What Ralph Nader should be working ...
Anderson: Weak link in Obama’s armor
Obama's support of Israel raises curious questions of Apartheid and human rights.
Party like a patriot
Be a maverick and shake up election season
Themeing the Night Away
Partygoers describe how themes transform house parties into something memorable.
Editorial: Why don’t students vote in this ...
Costume shops offer a variety of Halloween ...
Lawrence costume shops allow students to choose from an assortment of outfits ...
Free: Even Phelps' speech must be protected
All speech, even thoroughly disgusting speech, is worth protecting.
Talk back: The 2008 Olympic Games in ...
What students say vs. what we say.
Montemayor: Somebody is watching them and you
Great athletes and everyday Joe’s are constantly under the watch of peers, ...
Rhetoric remains subject of debate
Emotion, reason difficult to balance in abortion protest tactics.
Modern-day people watching
The evolution of our peering culture through the use of new media.
Robot goat arrives
Jawhari: Egypt deserves US support in effort ...
The recent wave of popular uprising in North Africa should be a ...
‘Big Religion’ marginalizing free speech
University issued "red-light" for freedom of speech
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education gave Kansas and 260 other ...
A guide to the proposed health care ...
A look at the health care bills that are being passed around ...
Cosby and Adams: Is social media good ...
In light of the recent Egyptian Revolution sparked by social media, two ...
Partisan hate doesn’t help discussion
Voters may not turn out
Even the historical nature of this year's election may not be enough ...
Anderson: As U.S. activates its military, others ...
Adams: Wisconsin professor rightfully practices freedom of ...
Professor William Cronon reminds us, as students, not to take our professors’ ...
Good vibrations
Slumber Parties allow women to view and purchase sex toys in privacy ...
Viva Vegetarian!
Campus offers a variety of options for vegetarians and vegans
Ryan: Conventional relationships leave students wanting more
Alternative breaks offer unique opportunities
A one credit hour class and $250 is the cost of admission.
Review: Prince of Persia The Two Thrones
Religious tolerance means recognizing freedom
In controversy over New York Islamic Center, roots of intolerance can be ...
Kansas in Heat: Three in the Bedroom
Tackling the sticky world of relationships
Mangiaracina: Why insignificant news trumps the real ...
Cohen: Marriage bill a step backward
Bill fails to address real issues of failed marriages.
Know your Student Senate candidates
Learn more about the candidates for Student Senate
Overcoming sexual taboo
How couples deal with fetishes
Reichert: Forget ObamcCain: Meet a true leader
Married? Yes. Graduated? No.
Some college students decide to add additional challenges of marriage to their ...
Kansas in heat: Giving and receiving
Tackle the sticky world of relationships.
Bush’s reasons for Iraq war all excuses
Women's issues encompass much more than presumed
Taking an extra lap
What's preventing students from completing their majors on time?
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Anderson: Two-party politics lean toward fascism
Linguo - You don't need history to know it's ingrained, all you've got to do is look around and notice the lack of critical analysis to see how "inside the box" we think: any other Democracy simply "does not compute". And maybe we have been fascist for hundreds of years..?
Anderson: Two-party politics lean toward fascism
herme- thanks for your input. My response would be to question the study's definition of "effectiveness" and also the sort of value we put on it: sure an "effective" candidate has a better chance of winning if there are fewer competitors. In terms of effective government, I would say that my focus in pointing these things out is on adequate representation. This doesn't lead to a cleaner, more efficient machine, but it does look more like democracy to me.
Besides that, the pigeonholing of people into easily explainable and proven "formulas" doesn't convince me of anything.
I will agree with you that dozens and dozens of parties would prove ineffective, but you're presupposing what I meant: I'm only bashing the two-party system (which I will continue to do). I'm not telling anybody how many parties they should have beyond saying that it should be more than two. Two parties is only one choice.
And the irony behind it all is exactly what you called "the poor quality and lack of innovation of our two parties", whose "vitality" and "democratic merit" I call into question in my column. If the two parties in question weren't such lame ducks, the probability of me having written this article would have been lower.
Thanks again -JS
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID