Students of Liberty’s platform goes ‘green' with wind turbines

The initiative involves one-third of the University’s electricity being provided by wind turbines

Students of Liberty, a student coalition competing in this year’s Student Senate election, has revealed its platform regarding building enough wind turbines to power one-third of the University.

Eric Hyde, vice presidential candidate for Students of Liberty, said his coalition’s goal would help the University in becoming more environmentally conscious.

“There’s a green revolution happening right now all over the world,” Hyde said. “The University of Kansas ought to be a leader in this new trend.”

At last week’s Student Senate debate, Hyde cited Pratt Community College as an example of a campus that took on the same initiative.

According to Pratt Community College’s Web site, it completed three EW-50 wind turbines last December.

Kent Adams, vice president of finance and operations at Pratt Community College, said the three wind turbines provided about 465,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year, which powered about 25 percent of Pratt’s campus.

The project’s initial cost was about $565,000, but Adams said it saved the campus about $46,700 per year. In 12 years, Pratt Community College will have saved enough to make back its initial investment, he said.

One key difference between the University of Kansas and Pratt Community College is the amount of electricity each uses. Adams said Pratt Community College used an average of about 1,860,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year, which is about 1.7 percent of the 107.5 million kilowatt hours the Universit used last year, according to the KU facility operations annual report.

Each wind turbine costs $155,000, Adams said, and produced about 155,000 kilowatt hours of electricity per year.

Adams said Students of Liberty’s plan was feasible, but expensive.

“It would be an awfully ambitious goal, but somewhere between 10 to 20 percent would strike me as pretty doable,” Adams said, referring to the how much of campus could be powered by the turbines.

William O’Donnell, marketing director at Entegrity Wind Systems, said the University had no way to predict how many wind turbines the University would need, how much the project would cost or how much the project could save without assessing the wind speed in Lawrence and the monthly amount the University pays for electricity.

O’Donnell said that a large number of turbines would likely be needed in order to save the University a noticeable amount of money, but he said he couldn’t predict the exact number unless his company performed a proper analysis of the University’s situation.

The biggest obstacle facing Students of Liberty would be getting the funding to pay the initial cost of the project, said Jeff Severin, director of the KU Center for Sustainability.

One of Students of Liberty’s biggest platforms is cutting student fees, which means that most, if not all of the funding, would have to come from the University itself.

“There would have to be a pretty major campaign to persuade the University to invest in something like that,” Severin said.

Hyde said that he was fully aware of the challenges facing his coalition in this initiative.

“One of the worst things you can have for ‘greening’ is politics mixed in with it,” Hyde said at last week’s Student Senate debate.

— Edited by Matt Hirschfeld

Comments

jarrodm (anonymous) says...

This is a great, innovative idea. Student Senate needs more thinking like this. I wish Students of Liberty luck to execute this plan next year, regardless of if they win office or not.

March 31, 2008 at 1:28 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

sjschlag (anonymous) says...

This is a very ambitious idea and will take alot of work to become a reality. However, we need more ambitious plans to take this University forward. So many coalitions have focused on smaller plans, so many coalitions tout that they will "improve sustainability". Only Students of Liberty has come up with a concrete way to actually do this.

On a similar tangent, how about we start up a nuclear engineering program and build a nuclear reactor on campus? We could generate easily half of the energy needed to power this campus, it would be clean and safe, and a side benefit would be the research that we could accomplish with a facility like this. Of course, a nuclear reactor would take a large monetary investment. Perhaps this would be a goal for many years in the future.

March 31, 2008 at 11:21 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

ilovelamp (anonymous) says...

That's a great idea! We could then use the newly cleaned Potter Lake as a cooler for the reactor! Now THAT'S what I call innovation.

March 31, 2008 at 11:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

MI5 (anonymous) says...

ilovelamp-

Come one, there is nothing wrong with exploring new ways to light the campus. It is this type of innovative thought that keeps the University of Kansas's name in the forefront of the minds of those who offer high-budget grants.

March 31, 2008 at 11:40 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

sjschlag (anonymous) says...

nuclear reactor side note...K-state has one.

March 31, 2008 at 2:11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

thatonedude (anonymous) says...

And it can power your lamp. This is the time prove that you really love it.

March 31, 2008 at 2:27 p.m. ( | suggest removal )