Monday, October 6, 2008
After some brief uncertainty, the first presidential and the first vice presidential debate happened. And they didn’t give us much we didn’t already know.
Don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed watching them, but the presidential debate didn’t include anything that will convert too many people.
There was more punch last Thursday, at least. Both candidates took not-so-subtle shots at each other and their running mates.
Sarah Palin would claim that Joe Biden and Barack Obama had disagreed on a key vote, and Biden would point out how John McCain had sided with Obama on that issue. Biden would point out how one of Palin’s social policies in Alaska did not conform to the GOP line, and she would… She would… Well, she reminded us how John McCain is a maverick. A lot. A maverick who happens to have the support of the leadership of a major political party.
The presidential candidates gave us the standard stuff. McCain thinks Obama is naïve and inexperienced. Obama thinks McCain’s been part of “the problem” the whole time.
I was impressed by how on-point Obama was. He avoided the usual “Change and hope for America and kittens and such” that he’s known for.
I enjoy the passion exuded by Obama in his speeches, but I was still a little worried that his arguments during the debate would be dominated by his usual rhetoric. I was relieved to see that that was not the case.
That may be both the high mark and the low with the first debate. Both candidates knew how to answer moderator Jim Lehrer’s questions, occasionally in a pointed way, but rarely did they actually go after each other.
McCain had some inaccurate statements about Obama’s foreign policy plans, and he was chided for that, but there was little else. Lehrer tried to get the candidates to address each other, but they only did when prompted. I am inclined to agree with a friend who opined to me later that the debate lacked any “big shocking revelations.”
What interested me were the graphs at the bottom of the screen during CNN’s broadcasts. Before either debate, anchor Soledad O’Brien introduced the audience to a focus group in Ohio, made up evenly of Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Throughout the debates, meters would be used to gauge how they felt about the candidates’ responses. Each group had a line. Naturally, Democrats were blue, Republicans were red, and Independents were some sort of sickly greenish yellow that just can’t exist in nature. During the vice presidential debate, the graphs measured the interest levels of male and female voters.
The two things that stuck out to me were how the Independents in the initial focus group seemed to consistently agree with the Democrats about the candidates and how there were some big drop-offs when McCain would start speaking. This included all three groups, though the red line would tend to spring back up quickly.
I’m hoping the main two are just biding their time, waiting to unleash something spectacular in the next few weeks. Maybe in the last two debates they’ll take cues from their running mates and show a little passion.
— Cohen is a Topeka senior in political science.
Poole: How narrow victories will pile up ...
Professor to give lecture on campaign ads
The lecture will cover Barack Obama’s and John McCain’s campaign advertisements and ...
Alaskan students weigh in on Palin
Students say she is a good governor but some think the vice ...
Biden says he and Obama ‘share a ...
Barack Obama and Joe Biden were officially named the Democratic presidential and ...
Sarah Palin makes for a fascinating, if ...
Since her elevation to the Republican ticket, the Alaskan governor has been ...
Poole: Republicans' VP pick shattered the mold
By choosing Gov. Sarah Palin, Sen. John McCain proved that he is ...
Sen. Barack Obama picks Sen. Joe Biden ...
After months of speculation, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee announces his running ...
Letter: Palin insulting to women’s causes
Nader speaks to Lawrence crowd
Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader reminded listeners at Abe and Jake's Landing ...
Editorial: Why students should vote for Obama
The Kansan editorial board's endorsement
Cohen: Sarah Palin who?
What was Sen. John McCain thinking when he chose the Alaskan governor?
Kansan bloggers' take on the prolonged primaries
Joshua Anderson, Andy Greenhaw and Kelsey Hayes discuss the ramifications of the ...
Obama’s ‘flip-flop’ doesn’t deter supporters
The Democratic Presidential nominee opts out of public financing, becoming the first ...
Sen. John McCain chooses Gov. Sarah Palin ...
McCain announced his choice of Palin on Friday morning.
Poole: Correcting rumors about Sarah Palin
Cohen: How Palin’s campaign made me appreciate ...
Hirschfeld: It’s not always bad to be ...
Dole speaks at RNC event
The former senator and presidential candidate backs McCain, slams Obama
Voters may not turn out
Even the historical nature of this year's election may not be enough ...
Armstrong: The election is over
The candidate wears Prada
Fashion-conscious politicians make their mark in modern pop culture.
The Iraq War
The two candidates offer different views on the Iraq War.
Edwards, Giuliani abandon race
Democrat John Edwards and Republican Rudy Giuliani have dropped out of the ...
Morning brew: could Palin's puck drop swing ...
Disappointment sets in for Republican supporters
GOP election watch parties break up early as Barack Obama defeats John ...
Sebelius VP bid ends
Home state, lack of foreign policy experience keep Kansas governor from winning ...
Past, present, future presidents discussed
The four-part series, presented by journalists and speakers from across the country, ...
Evaluating presidential platforms
Obama and McCain differ on three major points during campaign.
Two sides of healthcare
Health insurance is one of the major issues this year.
Party like a patriot
Be a maverick and shake up election season
How fair and balanced is the news?
The presidents of KU College Republicans and KU College Democrats will reach ...
The influences behind KU students’ votes
Political affiliations and candidate reputations are likely to affect students when they ...
Cohen: Dems’ indecision may cost them
The DNC needs to sort out the nomination, or it may regret ...
Red and blue don't always mix
While U.S. politics are heating up headlines, politically mixed relationships are feeling ...
Oberthaler: Tongue in Beak
Gobble up your week's dose of satire.
Poole: How over-regulation has ruined Wall Street
Student town hall forum on the presidential ...
The Dole Institute of Politics plays host to the morning crew of ...
Thompson: How the culture of fear relates ...
A Q&A with Gov. Kathleen Sebelius
Kansas' governor discusses the issues.
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
Clearly, you weren't watching closely enough. McCain totally destroyed Obama and his positions, exposing him for the tax-raising secret Muslim Pakistan provoking community organizer he is. Similarly, the Palin-won debate exposed Biden as a slimy elitist, and drove home that Palin is a real AMERICAN who knows what's best for this country, and that's a MAVRICK, backed up by another MAVRICK. She's such a MAVRICK she openly tolerates homosexuals! Even Biden couldn't argue with her on that.
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
pantheon - you forgot to mention how Obama will give all the babies that survive the abortions to gay couples, probably turning them gay in the process.
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
It goes without saying that Obama causes homosexuality in males. He is a dangerous subversive, and I don't have to take it.
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
There's also that piercing gaze.
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
Calling these "debates" is a flagrant misnomer. When two people debate they actually engage one another. What we get is more like opportunity to dish out more talking points.
But both sides want to avoid a real debate. They might actually come to a consensus and solve some problems in a debate. It's better to make issues black-and-white and hope your side seems less absurd.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID