Thursday, October 9, 2008
With the financial crisis, every public program is vulnerable. Although dumping pork out of the barrel is necessary, the Lawrence city commission should carefully consider the importance of projects that promote causes beneficial to the common good before swinging a hatchet at the municipal budget.
One of those causes is protecting the environment, which is why the Lawrence City Commission shouldn’t set aside its plan to expand recycling.
The discussed expansion involves a city-sponsored curbside recycling program.
A prominent criticism of curbside recycling is that the city pays more for a marginal increase in recycling. This is especially true when a city already provides places to recycle, as Lawrence does.
For those who can’t make it out to recycle, mandatory recycling is the solution. Implementing a mandatory program is the most cost-efficient way to drastically increase recycling. Virtually 100 percent of the population would recycle for the same cost of a non-mandatory program.
Cities, such as New York City, Seattle, Philadelphia, San Diego and, perhaps surprisingly, Newton, Kan., have implemented mandatory recycling. It’s not new either. Connecticut has required recycling since 1991.
Enforcement would be simple and would add no extra costs. Trash collectors would inspect bags if they hear or see recyclables. If the bags have a certain amount of recyclable material — in Newton it’s seven items — a warning notice is posted on the bag and it is not picked up. Fines become involved if a household repeatedly disregards the ordinance. Randy Jackson, the street and sanitation superintendent for Newton, said citizen compliance with the law is “very good.”
The expenses of a mandatory curbside program would not be any higher than a voluntary one. When San Diego changed from voluntary to mandatory recycling, it didn’t need to hire additional staff, buy additional trucks or expand their buildings.
A feasibility report from the Lawrence Public Works Department, which is available on the city’s Web site, concluded that pickup every other week would cost each household $9.02 per month.
However, the report doesn’t factor in the amount the city would save in landfill fees and the revenue it would receive from selling recyclables.
These figures aren’t junk change, either. According to a separate report released by the city, Lawrence saved $580,513 in landfill fees last year and made $228,022 from selling recyclables it collected in receptacles already scattered throughout the city.
This makes the cost per household about $6 per month, which coincidentally is the same amount the majority of Lawrencians said they’d pay for curbside service in a survey the city commissioned.
Lawrencians need to shift the way they think about reducing waste, and a mandatory curbside recycling program will help play the role of facilitator.
The burden is small. Once a household plans out the logistics, curbside recycling will be as easy as managing trash.
It’s something that’s universally recognized as good and necessary for the preservation of future generations. It’s something the city should seriously consider.
— — Ian Stanford for the editorial board
Lawrence seeks solutions to recycling question
The city is assembling a task force to weigh its options.
Greening it
Your guide to greener living
City still looking into curbside recycling
Private companies offer curbside service while the city and University are looking ...
Curbside pick up
Recycling is just like putting out the trash.
Where your waste goes after it’s disposed
Follow the process your trash and recyclables go through after they’re tossed ...
How to take out your e-trash
Get rid of those electronics in an eco-happy manner
Editorial: Despite inconvenience, students need to recycle
Recycling may be a burden but there are recycling options in Lawrence.
Don’t dump, donate instead
Local charities and Web site recycle old goods within the community.
Lawrence considers ideas for trash disposal
The city staff proposed plans to save on wages and workers’ compensation ...
High-tech health hazard
How to keep your old cell phone from turning toxic
KU students team up with Boulevard Brewery
Student chapter helps local brewery with upcoming waste audit as brewery prepares ...
Editorial: Recycling is easier than you think
Paper isn't the only recyclable material on campus.
Recycling: it's not that hard to do
There are numerous recycling centers in Lawrence, so students do not have ...
University recycles more than paper and plastic
Besides the standard recyclables, the University also recycles bubble wrap, packing peanuts, ...
Students’ audit measures Wescoe’s waste
A class of five seniors sorted through a day’s worth of trash ...
BYOB: Bring Your Own Bag
For more than just sack lunches
Wakarusa gets cleaned up
Festival goers encouraged to recycle and exchange trash for prizes.
Audit at brewery is first step in ...
Several KU students volunteered at Boulevard Brewing Company on Friday.
Eco-Chic
Local artists use old clothing and items found in dumpsters to fashion ...
Recycling in Lawrence is easier than you ...
Letter to the Editor: Bottled water safe ...
Bottled water company cares about the safety and environmental impact of its ...
Greening it
Your guide to greener living
Students dig deeper into recycling
Several student groups are taking new looks at recycling on campus.
Campus groups promote recycling, reducing
The Center for Sustainability will be giving away reusable bottles and bags ...
Handshy: Creative thinking can eliminate the waste ...
Some restaurants are going green with their trash; now customers have to ...
Group encouraging bars to recycle glass
Students for Bar Recycling is promoting green measures to decrease waste at ...
Kansan Departments
Your guide to surviving the week.
Editorial: Recycling group reminds what parties leave ...
Remnants of your night out exist long after the parties end.
Decision on Oread neighborhood boarding houses deferred
Oread neighborhood's future remains undecided until next week's city commission meeting.
Q & A: Lawrence Mayor Aron Cromwell
Kansan reporter D.M. Scott has a question and answer session with Mayor ...
Volunteers recycle game-day cans
Students team with non-profit to collect and cash in record number of ...
Reusing hazardous waste saves city and citizens ...
Lawrence’s hazardous waste site offers free use of common household products.
Editorial: How Budig turned into a ‘waste’ ...
Wood-chip sale encourages recycling
The Lawrence Parks and Recreation held its annual wood-chip sale last week ...
Court fines increase
The cost of many fines with in the Lawrence Municiple Court will ...
English: How I finally transitioned to reusable ...
New service recycles campus furniture
The University of Kansas Environmental Stewardship Program is developing a new way ...
From left: Kimberlee Hinkle, Libby Johnson and Hannah ...
1 comment
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
Comments
Editorial: What would make Lawrence recycle?
The reason that recycling doesn't work in lawrence is because burying our trash is cheaper than recycling it. Unfortunately (or fortunately) the areas around lawrence contain soils and geology that is almost perfect for safe disposal of household wastes and trash. It is ridiculously cheap to bury our trash here.
Lawrence already determined that the majority of waste going to the landfill was yard wastes- grass clippings, branches, dirt, leaves, etc. and has instituted a program that picks these items up on a different day. Yard waste is placed in a giant compost pile, composted and offered to the community for free. Additionally, a number of private companies operate in Lawrence which recycle various materials, at an additional cost to the homeowner who wishes to recycle.
Do not forget that some materials cost more to recycle than they do to throw away. The market for recycled aluminum may be very lucrative right now, but the demand for recycled glass is nearly non-existent. Reason? Glass costs more to recycle than it does to produce new glass. Aluminum is almost the same, but the process to refine aluminum takes alot of energy, so the demand for re-used aluminum creates an incentive to recycle. Paper is very valuable in the secondary market as well.
So with no real incentives to recycle more, and limited or no funds available, the city of Lawrence should not institute mandatory recycling. There are more important issues that the city needs to deal with- such as crumbling roads and infrastructure, a public transportation system that is on the verge of financial collapse, outdated fire equipment, just to name a few.
Editorial: What would make Lawrence recycle?
Sam makes a good point: If it takes less energy to produce a new product rather than recycle an existing one, recycling isn't good for the environment.
This is certainly the case for glass and I'm not sure about other products.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID