Monday, October 20, 2008
The University is, officially, a dry campus. Alcohol is not allowed anywhere.
But students drink anyway. Considering that banning alcohol has been ineffective, the University should consider changing its policy to allow alcohol on campus for students who are 21 or older.
For students who are already 21, banning alcohol makes no sense. These students are considered responsible adults everywhere else but on this campus. This is tantamount to saying that students’ ability to responsibly consume alcohol is dependent on where they are geographically.
In addition, students who are forced to break rules to consume alcohol they can obtain legally may not see the harm in buying alcohol for students who are minors. They are already breaking rules and smuggling booze like a criminal, so there is little incentive to follow the rest of the rules about alcohol.
Drinking in bars is seen as an alternative to the ban, but there are problems with that.
The ban encourages students to spend money away from campus, depriving on-campus facilities of potential revenue.
The Athletics Department would also benefit from a wet campus. One of the reasons NASCAR is popular is because drinking is allowed in the infield. The Athletics Department is missing out by keeping beer out of Allen Fieldhouse. It might even pay for some of those practice field trees.
Other colleges have policies that allow alcohol. For example, the official policy at Yale is that unless somebody calls in with a complaint, campus officials will take no action concerning alcohol use on campus. Princeton has no policy restricting alcohol use on campus by anyone over the age of 21. Neither does Cornell.
Obviously, alcohol does not stop a college from reaching for excellence.
The University should change its policy concerning alcohol. It is sending money away from the college and the Athletics Department, encouraging students to handle their booze irresponsibly and increasing the risk of drunken driving.
The policy is not working. Other colleges have realized that regulation and control of alcohol on campus is more effective than a dry campus policy, and it’s time our University did, too.
— — Sam Lamb, special to the editorial board
A sobering reality
Two years after Jason Wren's death, what has changed?
Housing proposal aims to stop alcohol abuse
A Student Housing recommendation would allow staff to enter rooms under suspicion ...
Alcohol related deaths could impact dorm privacy
Change to policy could eliminate need for search warrants in dorms.
University’s alcohol initiatives considered good start
Researchers say new initiatives must control alcohol consumption in entire Lawrence community ...
University policy regarding the flow of booze ...
The rules and regulations of serving alcohol on University grounds.
Face-off: Risks too high
Editorial: KU needs stronger policies on alcohol
The Kansan supports establishing tighter controls on underage drinking.
University re-examines privacy policy
Following Jason Wren’s death, University considers allowing parents more access to student’s ...
Excessive and accepted
Lawrence, KU culture may contribute to students' high levels of alcohol consumption.
Protesters say pot is safer alternative
Campus alcohol abuse stirs nationwide debate, arguing marijuana use shouldn’t be penalized.
Shorman: Dry-campus reconsidered
Bringing alcohol back on University property; possibility with a new provost.
An exception to the alcohol policy
Use of alcohol at athletic events must be related to fundraising.
Task force meets about campus alcohol problems
The new University Alcohol Task Force considers pre-game drinking and campus chalking ...
A sobering conversation
University struggles to address the complexities of alcohol policy in the wake ...
Editorial: Proposed policy infringes on privacy
Past semester’s alcohol related deaths spur proposal to inspect students rooms
Alcohol policy adds amnesty, parent notification
The University’s revised alcohol policy also includes an online assessment for incoming ...
University changes alcohol policy, adds amnesty clause
Officials will notify parents of underage students who violate alcohol or drug ...
Letter to the Editor: Habits form early
Binge drinking begins before freshman year of college.
New alcohol policy fails to pass
The student rights standing committee voted no to allowing senior staff members ...
Editorial: Excessive drinking hurts academic success
Be responsible when you go out.
Letter: Fraternity has changed since death
Fraternity has implemented changes to house policies and rules.
Hartz: FERPA not the real problem in ...
Even if the policy changed, enforcing it would be nearly impossible.
Alcohol on the brain: a look at ...
Binge drinking may have negative long-term effects that many students don’t realize.
A staggering tragedy
Friends and family look for answers while struggling to cope with an ...
Subcommittee to meet Wednesday to revise alcohol ...
Senate group met last night to discuss rules with student body.
Police deter underage drinking
Lawrence police are stepping up enforcement of alcohol consumption laws during on-campus ...
A tender toss of fun
But that doesn’t mean the competition isn’t tough
Father calls for change after son's death
Jay Wren says both fraternity environment and his son are partially to ...
Stricter rules for booze
Theft ranks high on Big 12 campus ...
See how KU compares to other Big 12 schools in annual crime ...
Four Loko nixes caffeine
The popular drink no longer contains stimulants, but maintains same alcohol content
Editorial: Students pay for bank policies
Overdraft fees are too high.
City passes stricter house party regulations
The new ordinance holds party hosts accountable for minors caught drinking.
Journal-World article fails to tell anything new ...
Turning 21
It's no longer about the first drink, but the 21st
Large percentage of students complete AlcoholEdu
The mandatory online exam has been completed by 94 percent of students ...
LMH sees increase in alcohol-related visits
KU students make up a major portion of hospital's alcohol abuse admissions.
A Tale of two cities: Lawrence and ...
Lawrence and Columbia offer entertainment options to students despite differences.
Face-off: Let them drink beer
Editorial: Policy infringes on student privacy
Proposed changes to the Department of Student Housing's policies could limit some ...
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Editorial: Why can’t of-age adults drink at KU?
Why can't "of-age" adults refrain from an obscene kickoff chant? This isn't a campus of adults, it's a campus of overgrown children.
Editorial: Why can’t of-age adults drink at KU?
Banning alcohol has been ineffective by whose standard? Let's see a study here, pal.
I'm not significantly opinionated either way, but I don't understand how NOT having alcohol on a few square miles encourages students to handle their liquor irresponsibly or increases the risk of drunken driving.
Editorial: Why can’t of-age adults drink at KU?
How did 21 become "of age"? The last time I glanced at the Constitution, which is supposed to be the supreme law of the land, it looked like a citizen becomes "of age" at 18, inasmuch as the rights and responsibilities of adulthood vest at that time. Reimposing prohibition on an arbitrarily selected segment of the adult popluation makes no sense and is contrary to our guiding principles. It also doesn't work any better than the original prohibition. People are going to make the decision themselves. Government may wish to encourage one decision over another, but should not - actually, cannot - make that decision for a part of the adult population.
Editorial: Why can’t of-age adults drink at KU?
First of all, I'm fairly skeptical of the notion that 21 year-olds are responsible drinkers.
Studies indicate that drinkers below the age of 25 are far more likely to participate in binge drinking - a common occurrence among KU students. Those who participate in binge drinking are more likely to suffer from reduced academic performance, more likely to commit crimes, and are more likely to die in alcohol related accidents, among many other things.
If it is the case, then, that those who are under the age of 25 are significantly more likely to be binge drinkers, and binge drinking involves many negative consequences, then would the University be doing its job if it allowed alcohol use on campus?
As an academic institution, KU's responsibility is to make policies that promote the academic and emotional progression of its students. If it's well known that alcohol use by college-aged folks, in general, does not lead to positive results, then it is KU's duty to maintain an alcohol-free campus.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID