Friday, October 31, 2008
"All human knowledge is tainted with an ‘ideological’ taint. It pretends to be more true than it is. It is finite knowledge, gained from a particular perspective; but it pretends to be final and ultimate knowledge.” — Reinhold Niebuhr
It’s a demoralizing time to be a Republican. The nomination of Sarah Palin has split the party’s ideological wing from its moderate pragmatists. Adherents of the former comprise an ideological school that came of age during the Reagan administration. Elevated by Reagan’s rise and vindicated by his successes, they brought the concentrated support of their movement behind George W. Bush, and their efforts brought him to power.
Today, they resist the disconcerting implications of Bush’s failures. Their reaction to the manifest failures of their ideology during the Bush years has been to demand ever stricter conformity with conservative doctrine.
The nomination of Palin is their coup, and their aim is to ensure the preeminence within GOP ranks of their ideology, an increasingly rigid canon, which fails to distinguish the present from 1981 and Barack Obama’s policies from unfettered socialism.
This tendency of conservative elites to ideological purity is troubling not only because it portends political oblivion for the GOP in the short-term, but also because it runs counter to the political flexibility and governing pragmatism that philosopher Edmund Burke hailed as essential components of stable governments.
Indeed, history carries stern lessons about political systems riven by such ideological hackery. It was similar ideological devotion that animated irreligious European intellectuals throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, and the history books are replete with chronicles of warring movements and nationalisms, failed governments and other murderous consequences of that period.
Customarily in America, it is left to liberals, leftists and godless intellectuals to make functional religions of their political ideologies, but now, conservatives too exhibit such tendencies.
The free market is their gospel, and Reagan is their messiah, and anything less is socialism.
Observe Fox News commentator Sean Hannity systematically dividing each of his callers and television guests into monolithic blocks of conservative true believers and unconverted liberals. Visit the Web site of the Heritage Foundation, a renowned conservative think tank, where a large banner asks with apparent seriousness, "What would Reagan do?"
Religion is by nature a dogmatic, uncompromising pursuit. Politics ought to be a pragmatic, flexible one. This important distinction goes back to Alexis de Tocqueville.
To de Tocqueville, the importance of religion in American life is that it acts as a check on the seductive ideologies to which human nature is naturally drawn. It trumps politics, relegating it to lesser realms where moderation and compromise are apt to prevail. By contrast, when the impassioned, uncompromising character of religious disputes is applied to politics, the result is factionalism, division, conflict and the obstruction of good governance.
When conservative political elites elevate ideology to the place of religion, it should raise red flags for moral reasons, if not strategic ones.
If far too few red flags are being raised, perhaps a well-deserved electoral landslide defeat early next week will do the trick.
— Armstrong is a Dallas senior in business.
Davidson: Remember Reagan for all his actions, ...
Many forget that Ronald Reagan's presidency was less than perfect.
Brinker: The great American rant
Everyone is angry, but where are the fingers really pointing?
Brinker: GOP moderates versus bleeding-heart liberals
There exists a fine line between the two ideologies.
Editorial: Slattery supports students’ interests
Brinker: Romney's conservatism a ploy to win ...
Republicans may find themselves disappointed if Romney ends up in the White ...
Brinker: Even when she gets it right, ...
Though Palin was right about our nation's "road to ruin", it is ...
Kennedy advocates environmentalism
Robert Kennedy Jr. said the environment is intertwined with everything in his ...
Compton: Liberalism versus conservatism
Political differences may arise from where parties believe rights originate.
Brinker: GOP seeks austerity for posterity purposes
If you take Boehner’s let-them-eat-cake statement at face value, you’d conclude that ...
Armstrong: The election is over
Past, present, future presidents discussed
The four-part series, presented by journalists and speakers from across the country, ...
Brinker: Social issues still key
The GOP race will come down to who has the best social-issue ...
De Oliveira: Calling an end to the ...
President Obama needs to avoid the confrontational nature of former President Bush.
Former GOP candidate to speak at Dole ...
Gov. Tim Pawlenty will give insight on the presidential primary Tuesday night.
Speakers share their memories of Reagan
Patton: Adkins could unite GOP
Amanda Adkins, the new chairwoman of the Kansas Republican Party, has a ...
Oberthaler: Tongue in Beak
Gobble up your week's dose of satire.
Lowell: War on Terror won at American ...
Cutting dependence on foreign oil is first step to success.
Minster: Party does not recognize Republican principles
Republicans used to think government should allow citizens to be responsible for ...
Brinker: Don't be too quick to declare ...
As some trends change, others remain the same.
Nephew of Michele Bachmann offers insights
Tyler Amble, nephew of GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, spoke about his ...
Poole: Correcting rumors about Sarah Palin
Abortion unalienable right
Brinker: Politics means idea of community needs ...
Politics on Campus takes a look at how politicking ruins community.
Holmes: Current Kansas GOP strength: a precursor ...
Holmes discusses the Kansas republican party's potential comeback.
Scott: Obama has shown courage
Obama may be starting to resemble Rodney Dangerfield.
Cohen: How Palin’s campaign made me appreciate ...
Cohen: Debates didn’t show us anything new
Letter: Palin insulting to women’s causes
Supporters cheer after Obama is named President
Students and Lawrence residents celebrate at watch party, relishing in the historic ...
Armstrong: Will Obama’s policy be any better ...
Editorial: Boyda has shown genuine progress
Book review: Freedom
Reading. it’s not just for textbooks, you know.
Speaker asks for change
Derek H. Davis explains problems with religious practices and their interaction with ...
Professor discusses politics abroad
Burdett Loomis traveled to several countries talking about the U.S. government. He’s ...
Letter: Economic views more important than evolutionary ...
Belief in evolution not specific to one party.
Oliveria: Brazil's AIDS policy works
The government recently forced Merck to allow mass production of the anti-AIDS ...
Alaskan students weigh in on Palin
Students say she is a good governor but some think the vice ...
Former ambassadors discuss genocide, war
Former U.S. Ambassadors Edward Brynn and Robert Beecroft spoke to students about ...
Letter to the Editor: Fundamentalists not representative ...
Criticisms of Saudi Arabia are unfair to the general population.
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Armstrong: What conservatives keep getting wrong
Our ideology didn't fail during the Bush years. The members of the Republican party who were in Congress (and Bush) did not adhere to it. In the few areas they did we have seen success.
The Bush tax cuts, for example, stimulated the economy to rousing success without sacrificing federal revenue. We faced deficits because of bloated spending, not something a conservative would advocate.
Armstrong: What conservatives keep getting wrong
The conservative ideology is still a winning ideology compared to the Leftist ideology. As connerm said, it's the people in Washington (Congress, not the President) that were supposed to implement the ideology that failed, not the ideology. The Republicans in Congress allowed spending to get out of control, becoming more like Democrats in the process. This is where they failed.
Leftists want to pin the economic calamity we are in on George W Bush. Bush hasn't failed insofar as his economic ideology. Look around: He faced a recession courtesy of the late-90s dot com bust as he took office; he faced 9/11. The economy rebounded with vigor. Then, with democrats pushing for easy lending and the Fed keeping interests rates too low in 2003, the housing price bubble was created which has now burst.
None of this was the doing of GWB. It's amazing that it has taken THIS long for our economy to stagger given the events of the last 8 yrs.
Bush failed where he: 1) Did not invite democrats to give their input, 2) Acted unilaterally in world politics, 3) Mishandled the oversite of the global war on terror.
NOTE: These are personal failings, NOT a failing of the conservative ideology.
Armstrong: What conservatives keep getting wrong
Just another leftist bashing piece of garbage that wouldn't hold under a minuscule amount of scrutiny, followed by a desperate attempt to save the failed conservative ideology by pretending that it just simply wasn't adhered to properly.
Give me a break. The conservative ideology in America is doomed to failure for its creation of the super rich and utter moral failure that it, once again, tries to blame on leftists.
And then of course, there's the predictable blaming of the minority secular population. It will never cease to amaze me how Christians can somehow be both the persecuted majority while launching endless bigoted attacks on other religious groups and secular people.
I've got a new slogan in mind for the 21st century:
"It's your ridiculous faith, stupid!"
Armstrong: What conservatives keep getting wrong
Please Prezandrew, give us some examples of conservative legislation that has made our situation worse.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID