Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Whether it’s double rolled, three-ply or extra soft, toilet paper finds its way into students’ lives every day. But Greenpeace wants Americans to think more about the harsh effects that soft, cushy toilet paper can have on the environment.
According to a green tissue consumer guide Greenpeace released last month, if every family in America substituted just one roll of regular toilet paper with a recycled roll, more than 400,000 trees would be saved.
John Gawin, Abeline senior, is a lead activist with Greenpeace in Lawrence. Gawin said he tried to buy everything recycled when he could, including toilet paper.
“I just like the idea of not wasting resources,” Gawin said. “I think if everyone did that, we could all do our part to prevent global warming.”
Green ranking
Green Forest
365
April Soft
Earth Friendly
Fiesta and Fiesta Green
Natural Value
Seventh Generation
Trader Joe’s
Yellow ranking
Marcal Small Steps
Earth First
Red ranking
Scott Naturals
Angel Soft
Charmin
Kleenex Cottonelle
Quilted Northern
Scott
Target
Wal-Mart
Gawin said students didn’t often think about where their toilet paper came from or about its possible environmental consequences.
“It’s just something that we’ve used since we were small children,” Gawin said. “It’s just been there our whole lives. No one would think about it because we just use it and flush it down.”
The tissue guide ranked the environmental friendliness of tissue products, including paper towels, facial tissues, paper napkins and toilet paper. The tissues were ranked green, yellow or red, with green being the best. The ranking is based on three criteria: 1) The tissue is made from 100 percent recycled content, 2) the tissue is made from at least 50 percent post-consumer recycled content and 3) the tissue is bleached without toxic chlorine compounds.
A green ranking meant the tissue product met all three criteria. Greenpeace recommended those products. A yellow ranking meant two of the criteria were met and the product could do better. A red ranking meant the product met one or none of the criteria. The guide recommended consumers avoid products with a red ranking.
The Greenpeace Web site emphasized the importance of creating toilet paper from recycled paper, not by taking the material directly from trees.
Sheila Lowry, Dillons spokeswoman, said the softer brands such as Charmin, Cottonelle, Angel Soft and Quilted Northern were the most popular brands sold. Dillons does offer two brands of recycled-content toilet paper, Seventh Generation and Small Steps, though they are not as popular, Lowry said.
Many consumers stay away from recycled toilet paper because it can feel rougher than softer brands, but Ben Dory, grocery administrative assistant at the Community Mercantile, 901 Iowa St., said his customers frequently stocked up on recycled toilet paper.
Dory said the Merc sold two different brands of recycled toilet paper: Seventh Generation and Green Forest. Both brands received a green ranking in the tissue guide.
Dory said the price of a four-pack for Seventh Generation was $4.39, and a four-pack for Green Forest would cost $1.99. He said the Seventh Generation rolls were more expensive because they were double rolls and used almost twice the amount of materials.
The price of a four-pack of Scott, which received a red ranking in the tissue guide, was $4.39 at Dillons, the same price as Seventh Generation.
Dory said that no matter the price, there were plenty of incentives to buy what he called a “more responsible product.”
“The discrepancy is all in the ethical value of buying this product,” Dory said.
— — Edited by Chris Hickerson
Mallot and Haworth Halls, two of the larger ...
1 comment
Mallot and Haworth Halls, already two of the ...
1 comment
It was the symmetry of this sidewalk that ...
1 comment
Texting while driving is the cause of many ...
1 comment
Comments
pantheon (anonymous) says...
"Dory said that no matter the price, there were plenty of incentives to buy what he called a 'more responsible product. The discrepancy is all in the ethical value of buying this product,' Dory said."
No. If there's an economic disadvantage related to recycling and purchase of recycled goods, all the ethics in the world won't let you support companies that sell recycled goods enough to make them competitive with companies that don't. It's good to know that people at the Merc have as much sense as I thought they did. Sure, I'll buy stuff there... if it's got a better price than somewhere else, with comparable quality.
April 15, 2009 at 10:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
pantheon (anonymous) says...
Stalker, prolific commenter, same difference.
April 15, 2009 at 1:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
pantheon (anonymous) says...
Then you should probably stop stalking.
April 15, 2009 at 1:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
em1 (anonymous) says...
Are these the same people who said breast milk should be used to make ice cream? I get all the liberal, tree hugging, hypocritical, self discrediting organizations confused...
April 15, 2009 at 2:12 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
pantheon (anonymous) says...
I thought that was PETA. They're totally insane, these guys are just ignorant and deluded. And as it turns out, that's not something restricted to "liberals" or "conservatives" here.
April 15, 2009 at 2:25 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )