Tuesday, July 28, 2009
As summer months come to an end and a new chancellor readies to take over the reigns at the University of Kansas, it seems like a perfect opportunity to make some positive changes.
The University of Kansas has long been on the verge of greatness. And, while the University has made great strides in some areas, such as research and athletics, there is still one thing keeping it from becoming a top-notch institution.
The current admission standards at the University ensure a constant flock of unprepared students who are unequipped to succeed here and who will ultimately fail or drop out.
KU currently accepts 92 percent of applicants — a greater percentage than any other school in the Big 12 Conference, making it one of the easiest major public universities in the Midwest to be accepted to.
“We are required to admit students to KU whom we know will likely fail,” said a July 2008 report by the Kansas Board of Regents State University Admissions Task Force.
The task force asked for a change in admission standards, noting that the current standards were proposed more than a decade ago.
“There is a disconnect between what it takes to be academically successful in college and what our admission standards indicate,” the report stated.
The University has asked to increase the admission standards, but Regents, who must decide, have made no action. If the University has been able to identify its own weaknesses, why haven’t Regents let it fix them?
Incoming Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little has identified increasing the quality of KU academics as one of her central goals. What better way to improve academics than to improve the quality of students?
Sure, it may cost a little more. The number of students would likely decrease as the University started to deny entry to some. But, with better-prepared students come more research grants, scholarships and awards. And successful students ensure top-rate faculty, exponentially increasing the quality of education across the University. Making the University more desirable would increase the number of applicants, eventually making up for any dips in enrollment.
Scraping through high school with a 2.0 GPA shouldn’t be enough to gain admittance. And being in the top-third of one’s class is an outdated and unrealistic tool of measuring success.
It should be a privilege to attend the University of Kansas. We should become a place that students from all over the world aspire to attend. Students, faculty and staff shouldn’t be satisfied with merely being a safety or back-up school for thousands of students. We should take the highly marketed term “best value” college as an insult. The University shouldn’t strive to be the best bang for one’s buck. It should strive to be the best.
— — Kevin Hardy for the Kansan Editorial Board
Task force wants pickier admissions
A group formed by Gray-Little has recommendations for increasing retention and graduation ...
University admission standards under review
An admissions task force formed by the Board of Regents approved recommendations ...
Future admission requirements may change
Kansas Governor and Regents discuss elevating school rankings by toughening standards.
Editorial: Raising admission standards will benefit all ...
Upping requirements would improve student retention and graduation rates.
Governor wants to improve school ranking
Parkinson calls for tougher admission standards.
Editorial: Students should lobby for higher standards
The University of Kansas needs to strengthen its admissions standards before it ...
Shorman: Sending the right message
Students expressed worries in discussion of raising admission standards.
Task force shares plan for retention, grad ...
Only 32 percent of students graduate in four years — 61 percent ...
Editorial: New chancellor more than ready
Bernadette Gray-Little possesses perfect qualities for the chancellor position.
Quality education, not athletic victories, has increased ...
Officials say that high academic standards and affordable prices are the reason ...
University looks to reverse recent enrollment trend
University officials are looking for new ways to increase enrollment at KU.
Editorial: Tuition increase mishandled
The proposed tuition increase leaves students' best interests behind
Editorial: Quality schools need funding
Doherty discusses budget cuts and the importance of school funding.
Chancellor examines University standards
University committee will work with Gray-Little to possibly change admissions and recruitment ...
Editorial: Students must remain top priority
Students shouldn't suffer for the state.
University should take closer look at graduation ...
The editorial board advises the University to take stronger measures to improve ...
Editorial: KU is a great value but ...
The University was listed on The Princeton Review's Top 100 Best-Valued colleges ...
Minimum credit hour requirements lowered for some ...
The University will decide how to implement ruling with individual schools.
Chancellor announced in Topeka
The Kansas Board of Regents chose Bernadette Gray-Little as Hemenway's replacement.
Admissions bar to raise for Kansans
Editorial: Admissions must focus on graduation rates
Though enrollment has dropped, the Board of Regents should keep their minds ...
Strategic recruitment in Student Success
The new associate vice provost for recruitment and enrollment hopes to improve ...
Editorial: Recommendations are solid, if they come ...
Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little's task force on graduation and retention needs more than ...
University may implement test to assess acquired ...
In the future, students at the University of Kansas may have to ...
Editorial: Chancellor search committee needs more students, ...
A variety of interests are represented on the committee, but are they ...
KU proposes tuition increase for 2010-2011 school ...
About 45 percent of students will see no increase in tuition rates.
Editorial: Students deserve kept promises from KUnited ...
Both coalitions led good campaigns. Let's see this carryover into a successful ...
Fireside chats with Bernadette Gray-Little
Reporter Jessie Blakeborough discusses everything from conference realignment to general education requirements ...
Editorial: Students can take action against housing ...
If students are against housing and dining increases, they should take actions ...
Editorial: Expectations still high for Chancellor
Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little still needs to prove that
Brown: Finding education outside of class
Cultural experiences like plays and musical performances are in abundance in Lawrence.
Editorial: University cannot afford to pay administrators ...
The University is paying new administrators extremely well at a high cost ...
Regents solidify legacy tuition discount
Out-of-state students with family ties to the University can apply for Jayhawk ...
Editorial: Proposed tuition freeze bests four-year compact
The tuition compact doesn't save money; rather, it helps students predict long-run ...
Honors faces more applicants, less money
After budget cuts, the Honors Program considers ways to cope with record ...
Regents approve increase in student housing costs
The Board of Regents today voted to increase student housing costs by ...
Business School goes against the grain
Despite national doubts of business majors, KU keeps its expectations high
Board of Regents needs additional state funding
Unless the Regents receive a 3.9-percent increase in funding, state universities will ...
Prospective law students to visit KU law
The KU law school is having an open house today from 10 ...
Budget reduction expected to raise tuition
Students covered by the University's tuition compact will not be affected, but ...
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Editorial: It's time KU tightens admission standards
Good editorial. Sounds like (based on Jack's comments above) that administration is on it.
Editorial: It's time KU tightens admission standards
This editorial just shows the lack of knowledge of the history of higher education policy in the state of Kansas. The Populist past has always been present in higher education. Many probably are not aware/forgot that it was less than 10 year ago that open admissions was still policy for all the regents schools.
I am actually floored that the KS Legislature gave the power over admissions criteria to the KSBOR. However, beware of what you ask for you might just get it.
The tighter admissions standards do help current grads and those who put stock in the USNWR rankings. Unfortunately, they do less for incoming students. It does ensure a higher standard, but would also likely lead to less students being becoming KU students, which means less tution dollars coming in...maybe this could be made up with more students who want to come now, but who knows.
In addition, the 4 lag time ensures that admissions standards are not revisted each year, but more importantly gives the KS HS community time to align their curriculum with requirements of KU. However, just because the KSBOR has the power now to approve tougher admission standards...don't be so sure that it is set in stone. If KU pushes to hard to move from the University of Kansas to a University in Kansas the KS Legislature could still come back or at the least just cut State Aid.
I am glad for the change, but if you are unaware of the past it might appear frustrating that this change hasn't seem to come soon enough.
Editorial: It's time KU tightens admission standards
Until this year admissions standards for public universities in Kansas were determined by the Kansas Legislature, not by the Board of Regents or the University of Kansas.
During the 2009 Legislature, the Board of Regents, with the support of KU, proposed that the Regents be given the authority to set admissions standards, including different standards to meet the needs of each university. This proposal was contained in House Bill 2197, which was passed by the Legislature and signed into law in March of this year.
Under this new law, universities will be allowed to implement different admissions standards, pending Regents approval and after a four-year waiting period that will ensure Kansas students know what a university's admissions requirements will be before they enter high school.
Jack Martin University Communications
Editorial: It's time KU tightens admission standards
Kevin: THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! I'm glad I'm not alone in this; buzz words like "best value" and "premiere university" don't enhance our reputation, they diminish it. Furthermore, the University's admissions requirements are only marginally more stringent than my local junior college. I dream of a KU whose academic prestige precedes its athletic renown.
Jack, did I read that correctly -- the new admissions requirements will not be enacted for another four years? It's easier to get into KU than Mizzou; that's a travesty. The time to act is now!
-Matt A proud, yet disgruntled, Jayhawk.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID