• Share
  • Share this item

    Send this to a friend

  • Grab the link

    Copy and paste the link:

  • Blog about it

    Blog about this page.

  • Close
• Comment
• Facebook
• Digg
• Delicious
• Print

There’s an old saying that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. We all have our moments of insanity. We try to make a pass at someone who we know isn’t interested. We try to cook a recipe we don’t have the right ingredients for. For my own part, I’m a Chiefs fan. It’s a tough life.

When somebody keeps trying something over, it’s usually harmless. Sometimes, though, there are people who don’t give up on an idea that won’t work, and will cost them dearly. Or, to be specific, will cost the country dearly. Something like $50 million dearly.

In all the excitement surrounding the public option health insurance debate, somebody has tried to bring his own insanity into the chambers of Congress. No, it wasn’t Glenn Beck (this time), but rather Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Hatch, most famous for his personal crusade against the BCS, was able to sneak in an amendment to recent health care legislation that would refund federal programs supporting abstinence-only sex education.

The amendment, which passed the Senate Finance Committee a few weeks ago by a single vote, restores $50 million to abstinence-only education. It was removed from the budget by President Barack Obama earlier this year, a move that upset some people. They were upset at the end of a program that they apparently expected to start working if we’d just keep it going a little while longer.

Just for everyone’s information, abstinence-only programs established in the mid-’90s did nothing to curb teen pregnancy or the spread of STIs among high school students. A federal report on such programs done by the Department of Health and Human Services mentioned that abstinence-only programs “did not affect the age at which sexually experienced youth first engaged in sexual intercourse.” There were also sections of the study mentioning that students who had this kind of sex education were just as likely to engage in unprotected sex as those who received more comprehensive education.

Now, Hatch and a few other senators want abstinence-only education to continue. They feel that a vaguely moral outlook, which paints premarital sex as rare and frightening, needs to be pressed upon people who have been empirically shown not to agree. I find it incredibly ironic that the same people who support measures such as this complain about the public option on the grounds that it would be expensive. Hatch wants to cut down on spending, yet at the same time spend millions on something that makes not a bit of sense. When I’m the one criticizing potentially wasteful government spending, something is seriously wrong.

The country is fighting back an economic recession. Meanwhile, teenagers run an increased risk of unplanned pregnancies and STIs because they weren’t given the chance to learn how to engage in sexual activity in a safe way. I don’t necessarily want to encourage more sexual activity among people who may not yet be mature enough to understand it, but closing our eyes and shouting, “La la, this isn’t actually happening,” isn’t the solution. Spending $50 million on just that ­— well, it’s just insane.

— Cohen is a Topeka senior in political science.

• Share
  • Share this item

    Send this to a friend

  • Grab the link

    Copy and paste the link:

  • Blog about it

    Blog about this page.

  • Close
• Comment
• Facebook
• Digg
• Delicious
• Print