Friday, October 9, 2009
I think it’s remarkable how reliant some individuals are on executive power to “change” laws, as Dan Thompson said in his column, “Gay Rights Deserve More Attention.” I certainly agree that equal rights are important, but what is President Barack Obama going to do?
First, it’s important to understand that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) does not “prevent the federal government from recognizing gay marriages.” It says no state needs to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state, which is such a clear and, frankly, stupid contradiction to the Privileges and Immunities Clause in Article IV, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. If a state refuses to recognize the marriage of another state, that couple is taxed at a discriminatory rate and denied the equal protection of laws.
Second, the executive branch does not make the laws. The President has the power to “carry out” and “faithfully execute” the laws. Thus, it is futile to place such responsibility on the president.
Third, Obama is a politician, and his motives are in favor of public support and votes. In case anyone missed the phenomenal vice presidential debate of 2008, Joe Biden, who spoke directly for the views of Obama, concurred with Sarah Palin’s statement that she “only supports a traditional marriage between a man and a woman.” Obama is going to stand for the position of the common voter, not the minority.
Gay marriage should not be “left up to the states,” as Thompson suggested. Instead, it is an issue that must be heard by the courts, overturned in states with laws to the contrary of that judgment and enforced by the executive.
— James Castle is a sophomore from Overland Park.
Gay rights debate rages on
This election could mean a new direction for gay rights
Thompson: Gay rights deserve more attention
Gay rights a pressing issue that the president should hear.
Legalizing Love: the state of same-sex marriage ...
A look at the battle for marriage equality.
Castle: Marriage should be between a man ...
People seem to be focused on whether same-sex couples should be allowed ...
Politically correct: same-sex marriage
Three political columnists share their thoughts on laws allowing same-sex marriage.
Castle: New York’s marriage equality symbol of ...
Politics is slowly catching up with cultural beliefs on marriage equality.
Graham: Is gay marriage really what we're ...
Editorial: Hospital benefits support gay rights
President Obama extended patient rights rights to gay men and women
Letter: What would happen if other advocates ...
Free: Court ruling a victory for equal ...
The LGBT scored a major victory earlier this month in the overturning ...
Visiting attorneys debate gay marriage at School ...
Panelists at "Same-Sex Marriage: Diverging Perspectives" offered their opinions on whether same-sex ...
Equality achieved, lost as struggle continues
Court loses chance to gain equality.
Gay marriage divides on religious lines
Brinker: Don't be too quick to declare ...
As some trends change, others remain the same.
Hirschfeld: It’s not always bad to be ...
KU professor co-edits advice paper for Obama
Law professor urges the president to act fast on health and environment ...
Student activists come out against Proposition 8
Members of Queers and Allies protested California’s ban on gay marriage with ...
Editorial: Why students should vote for Obama
The Kansan editorial board's endorsement
Cosby: California court case still carries weight ...
Debate on Proposition 8 is about more than gay rights.
Free: Separation means politicians should keep beliefs ...
It's time our policy members realize the true meaning of separating church ...
Brinker: GOP moderates versus bleeding-heart liberals
There exists a fine line between the two ideologies.
Ten Commandments should unite, not divide Americans
Student Housing sponsors lecture on LGBT issues
John Corvino will visit Hashinger Hall theater to heighten students’ understanding of ...
Group seeks equality in University benefits
University Senate will consider task force recommendation to extend employee benefits to ...
Cosby: Iowa Supreme Court judged on specific ...
Removal of Iowa judges is worriesome.
Voters may not turn out
Even the historical nature of this year's election may not be enough ...
A Q&A with Gov. Kathleen Sebelius
Kansas' governor discusses the issues.
Brinker: Even when she gets it right, ...
Though Palin was right about our nation's "road to ruin", it is ...
Cohen: Sarah Palin who?
What was Sen. John McCain thinking when he chose the Alaskan governor?
Letter: Palin insulting to women’s causes
Bornstein: Second-class citizenship
Same-sex marriage ensures equal rights for all U.S. citizens.
Castle: Anti-same-sex marriage debater ignores research
Same-sex parents should be given same rights as other-sex parents if the ...
Compton: Arrogance spills onto foreign policy
Obama's promise to rebuild international relations hasn't been successfully followed up.
Red and blue don't always mix
While U.S. politics are heating up headlines, politically mixed relationships are feeling ...
Dole speaks at RNC event
The former senator and presidential candidate backs McCain, slams Obama
A look at KU's changing face of ...
University's turbulent past has evolved into a somewhat tranquil state of activism.
Alumnae top Forbes’ 100 Most Powerful Women
Two graduates rank within top 10 in Forbes Magazine’s 100 Most Powerful ...
Alaskan students weigh in on Palin
Students say she is a good governor but some think the vice ...
Editorial: Policy for equal protection in the ...
The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is discriminating to homosexuals and the ...
Sarah Palin makes for a fascinating, if ...
Since her elevation to the Republican ticket, the Alaskan governor has been ...
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Lecture from Greg Mortenson, co-author of New York ...
0 comments
KUnited presidential candidate Libby Johnson and vice presidential ...
1 comment
Comments
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
Dick Cheney is for gay marriage.
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
I don't think the 10th amendment gives states carte blanche to take away the rights of American citizens, glenjamin.
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
Correct, because the 14th Amendment would pre-empt that.
However, if not for the 14th Amendment, the 10th Amendment would. However, nobody takes the 10th Amendment seriously anymore.
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
The Ninth Amendment vaguely states that citizens have other rights; it does not specifically define any of these rights, nor does the wording in any fashion suggest that these rights are unlimited in scope.
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
I think it's pretty clear that, barring an amendment, there is no constitutional right for the federal government to say anything about marriage. The next natural questions are:
Who defines marriage?
What level of government CAN define marriage and decide who may and may not enter this contract? There is a difference between registering couples who decide to marry and deciding who is eligible to be on the register. The fact that the government keeps a list does not dictate that it may decide who may be on that list.
Who chooses for the entire population what the definition of this term is?
Should the majority have the rule in this case?
Does the majority's opinion infringe on the ability of others to do as they see fit, or does it protect the nation from a threat that might be brought on by multiple definitions of the same word?
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
Marriage is an aging and unnecessary social institution either way.
Letter to the Editor: Gay rights
glenjamin, the first ten amendments (Bill of Rights) protect CITIZENS from the FEDERAL government; it does not protect citizens from STATE governments. Also, DOMA gives the state the authority to choose to recognize same-sex marriages, so Amendment X is not relevant to this letter.
Hendrix321 is correct that the 14th Amendment SHOULD protect same-sex marriage in terms of constitutional rights. However, the federal statute I was referring too in this letter (DOMA) is not relevant to the Equal Protection Clause in the 5th through the 14th Amendments.
connerm, states are delegated police powers over health, public welfare, and morality, and who can marry is viewed as a question of morality. Also, the logic of "majority rule" is a clearly a poor choice when we're talking about civil rights for minorities.
handy, good point=]
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID