Tuesday, February 16, 2010
While state legislators were working this month to outlaw synthetic forms of marijuana such as K2, a new House bill sprouted that proposes the real thing be made available in Kansas.
Pending Medical Marijuana States
- Alabama
- Delaware
- Illinois
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Missouri
- New York
- North Carolina
- Pennsylvania
- Tennessee
- Wisconsin
Gail Finney, a Wichita House Democrat who serves on the House Health and Human Services Committee, introduced bill 2610 this month. It calls for the legal use of marijuana for medical purposes.
Medical Marijuana States
- Alaska
- California
- Colorado
- Hawaii
- Maine
- Michigan
- Montana
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- Oregon
- Rhode Island
- Vermont
- Washington
While the bill closely resembles those of the 14 states that already allow the use of cannabis for medical reasons, Kansas likely has a long way to go before actually passing the bill.
“This is definitely a marathon not a sprint,” Finney said.
Finney’s bill makes Kansas one of the 13 states that now have pending legislation to legalize medical marijuana.
“I at least want to open up the door for discussion,” she said.
Part of Finney’s reason for writing the bill comes from her empathy with the chronically ill, she said. Finney suffers from Lupus and said she has experienced unwanted side effects from medications. She decided to take action after receiving numerous positive testimonies from people who have used cannabis as an alternative.
According to Pain Management of America’s website, doctors typically prescribe marijuana to treat chronic pain, nausea, glaucoma, seizure disorders, cancer, diabetes, muscle spasms and other ailments.
“There are so many people that are suffering with chronic illnesses, and I just don’t believe they should be criminalized for trying to make themselves feel better,” Finney said.
Allen St. Pierre, executive director for the National Organization for the Reformation of Marijuana Laws, said this type of legislation typically becomes less controversial after the facts have been debated openly.
“This is the first one out, which means it’s probably not going to go too far,” he said. “The second time out it probably should pass but won’t because the body politic will really dig their heels in and commit a lot of time and energy to oppose the truth. And by the third time it comes out the opponents really don’t have much of an argument anymore.”
He said although Kansas was historically a very socially conservative and anti-drug state, college towns such as Lawrence have always been breeding grounds for social change.
“Lawrence is by far the hotbed of progressivity, and from my point of view, real rational thought, but it has to run up against the rest of the state,” St. Pierre said.
Gina Burrows, president of the Young Democrats of KU, said she has been to meetings with the Kansas Progressive Caucus and found wide hesitance among the group to support such an initiative.
“We were definitely having a problem getting any members of the legislature to introduce their support for such a bill, which unfortunately I think has more to do with their re-election chances than necessarily how they always feel,” she said.
Burrows said that often the problem was not having a unified citizen voice to encourage legislators to support controversial initiatives.
“Most of the progressive community in Kansas feels like such a minority that they don’t tend to be vocal,” she said. “I really think they’d find that they are less of a minority if willing to ban together and assert to their legislators that there is a larger than expected population that would be on board.”
If the bill were to pass, it would allow “compassion centers” to dispense Kansas-grown cannabis to qualifying patients.
Finney said there was an opportunity for state revenue from the centers’ licensing and fees and the possibility of taxing the product.
“It could create jobs, it could create business, it could create an industry for Kansas,” she said.
While support among the legislatures for the bill is low, Finney said “quite a few” members have told her they support the initiative, but aren’t able to publicly endorse it for various reasons.
— Edited by Taylor Bern
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
A member of the Westboro Baptist Church holds ...
2 comments
Obama may be reconsidering his plans to open ...
1 comment
Good 'ol American hospitality...
1 comment
Junior right fielder Brian Heere gives teammates fist ...
1 comment
Lisa Donnelly, a 2002 KU graduate, sits at ...
1 comment
Comments
Marijuana bill reaches House
If doctors want to prescribe it, why is this even an issue? Furthermore, it would generate revenue and if made legal across the board, end a lot of the drug violence. Who profited from prohibition? Gangsters. Who profits from drug prohibition? Drug cartels. History repeats itself.
Marijuana bill reaches House
As long as marijuana remains illegal, drug cartels will continue to profit. It's too bad that big pharmaceutical companies don't see the potential in cannabis. My guess is that it's their work that keeps the masses fearful of what marijuana can do. After all, if marijuana were legalized, who would buy zoloft anymore or need xanax?
Marijuana bill reaches House
‘Gold Standard’ Studies Show That Inhaled Marijuana Is Medically Safe And Effective
http://kfmm.org/documents/CMCR_REPORT_FEB17.pdf
When will Kansas politicians listen to the constituents they represent? When will they stop delaying, denying, and criminalizing viable healthcare options? When will they stop playing pharmacist, doctors, or moral police?
Healthcare should be science based and evidenced based and not politically based.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20100217/NEWS/100217017/-1/NEWS04/Iowa-pharmacy-board-opens-door-for-medical-marijuana
http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/2009/02/heres_an_unbelievably_cold_cru.php# http://www.pitch.com/2010-02-18/news/kansas-legislature-bans-k2-synthetic-marijuana/
Or login with:
OpenID