Wednesday, January 27, 2010
With the majority of the nation looking to save even a few dollars, it is not a surprise that the state of Kansas is trying to economize a budget that is becoming more and more of a problem.
On Friday, a Senate committee will review a proposal to repeal the death penalty in Kansas. The Senate should vote in favor of the repeal, not only because it is a human rights issue, but because it will save the state a substantial amount of money.
During a budget crisis, even a traditionally conservative state should see the benefits of saving money from the proposed bill.
Today, The Kansan reported that Sen. Marci Franciso (D-Lawrence) said she thought the primary reason this topic was being discussed was because of the status of the budget. A death penalty prosecution can cost as much as a million dollars, she said, while a life sentence without parole could save taxpayers half a million dollars or more for each case.
According to Senate Bill 208 the average cost of a murder case without the death penalty sentence costs approximately 70 percent less than the average cost of a case that does have a death sentence. The misinformed argument that it is too expensive to impose life sentences without parole is false.
Kansas is one of 35 states that have a death penalty sentence for certain crimes. In Kansas, capital punishment has not been used once since its re-enactment 16 years ago. This lack of use is yet another reason to eliminate an unnecessary, money draining procedure.
Aside from monetary reasons, the death penalty also raises human rights questions. Capital punishment has a history of racism and execution of the innocent. These problems, along with fiscal motivations, establish a firm argument against the death penalty law.
The Senate committee will be making a fiscally responsible decision, as well as voting in favor of human rights, if it passes this bill to the full Senate. Students at the University, who are affected by the state budget, should contact their senators to support repealing the death penalty law.
— Caitlin Thornbrugh for the Editorial Board
Kansas could abolish death penalty to cut ...
Hoping to reduce state spending, the Senate Judiciary Committee is considering a ...
Cosby: Fourth rescheduling of execution date shows ...
Troy Davis' case is clear representation of how flaws in the justice ...
New bill could reduce pay for university ...
Kansas faces deeeper budget cuts to balance budget shortfall of $550 million.
Letter: Eliminating death penalty won’t solve flaws ...
Argument for abolishing death penalty in recent column was flawed.
Cosby: Death to the death penalty
Capital punishment is inhumane and costly.
Capital punishment: Death to the death penalty
Patton: Governor lacks leadership
Governor's plan fails to address problem of excessive spending
Stricter punishment underway for hit-and-run offenders
State officials and family members of hit-and-run victims are now enforcing a ...
Editorial: Kansan endorses Heilman, encourages split-ticket vote
The Kansan supports the top United Students ticket, but applauds other coalitions' ...
Student Senate will vote on budget, amendments
Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little will speak before Senate votes.
Thompson: The cost of closing state-funded institute
Kansas Neurological Institute may be closed by the state.
Budget deficit forces transportation cuts
Governor’s proposal avoids further cuts to education
Editorial: Proposed cuts risk future funding for ...
No matter how the student senate defines it, funding for important resources ...
Cosby: Death penalty should be abolished while ...
Putting innocent people to death is just one reason why Kansas should ...
Editorial: Students should show support for anti-discrimination ...
Despite inconvenient meeting times, students should give support of Human Rights Ordinance.
Women's issues encompass much more than presumed
Bill could mean financial aid overhaul
All future government loans would be offered as Federal Direct Loans.
Senate Finance Committee passes cuts to media ...
The full Student Senate will take up the issue in two weeks.
Regents approve tuition hike, technology fee
State now pays less for education than the University's students.
Student body president responds to controversy in ...
Finance committee approves proposal to remove funding from Willow Domestic Violence Center, ...
Bill could double wholesale alcohol tax
Lawmakers propose increase to alcohol tax in response to state budget cuts
Editorial: Students need to see the consequences ...
Lawrence police are cracking down on fake ID use this month.
State cracks down on drivers texting and ...
Individuals will now be ticketed for not wearing their safety belt.
Editorial: Join Senate subcommittee to examine alcohol ...
Students should voice their opinion as members of the University.
Editorial: University cannot afford to pay administrators ...
The University is paying new administrators extremely well at a high cost ...
A guide to the proposed health care ...
A look at the health care bills that are being passed around ...
Rose sentenced to 122 months in Boardwalk ...
Jason Rose was sentenced Monday to 122 months after being convicted last ...
Pork politics
High-earning state employees to take pay decrease
Employees making more than $100,000 will take the cut; employers worry about ...
Title X funding up in the air
A proposed bill would cut $317 million in reproductive health care and ...
Some students receive in-state tuition despite being ...
Editorial: Senate should not put hold on ...
Kansas needs to take a stand against discrimination based on sexual orientation ...
Republican looks ahead to 2012 election
KU College Republicans invited Rep. Lynn Jenkins to discuss the Republican Party’s ...
Two third-year law students win national award
Two University Law students won best brief at the Herbert Wechsler National ...
Editorial: Cutting Stop Day acceptable only if ...
In exchange for eliminating Stop Day, students should have a week free ...
Commission votes against addition to discrimination policy
City won’t add protection for transgender identity.
From left: Kimberlee Hinkle, Libby Johnson and Hannah ...
1 comment
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Comments
Editorial: Kansas needs to repeal the death penalty law
You need to fact check:
Yes, the "study" found that death penalty cases cost 70%, or about $500,000 more, per median case cost than for the equivalent non death penalty murder case, but, the foundation was this:
" . . .there was nothing we could look at to verify the accuracy of any of the data assembled for this report." (page 2) (1).
Why is that, you may ask?
"Actual cost figures for death penalty and non death penalty cases in Kansas don't exist." (page 10) (1).
On pages 29 and 31 the study discussed methods of saving money. Again, please refer to "Cost Savings: The Death Penalty".
(1) "Performance Office Report: Costs Incurred for Death penalty Cases", A K-Goal Audit of the Department of Corrections, by the Legislative Division of Post Audit - A Report to the Legislative Post Audit Committee, December 2003
http://www.kslegislature.org/postaudit/audits_perform/04pa03a.pdf
Editorial: Kansas needs to repeal the death penalty law
"Cost Savings: The Death Penalty" http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/05/07/cost-savings-the-death-penalty.aspx
Duke (North Carolina) Death Penalty Cost Study: Let's be honest http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/06/duke-north-carolina-death-penalty-cost.html
"The Death Penalty: Not a Human Rights Violation" http://homicidesurvivors.com/2006/03/20/the-death-penalty-not-a-human-rights-violation.aspx
Editorial: Kansas needs to repeal the death penalty law
"Death Penalty Sentencing: No Systemic Bias" http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/07/death-penalty-sentencing-no-systemic.html
"The Death Penalty: More Protection for Innocents" http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/05/the-death-penalty-more-protection-for-innocents.aspx
23 recent deterrence studies finding for deterrence, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPDeterrence.html
"Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Reply to Radelet and Lacock" http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/02/deterrence-and-the-death-penalty-a-reply-to-radelet-and-lacock.aspx
"Death Penalty, Deterrence & Murder Rates: Let's be clear" http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/03/death-penalty-deterrence-murder-rates.html
Editorial: Kansas needs to repeal the death penalty law
I don't think it's inconsistent for someone who is pro-life (i.e., pro-innocent-life) to also be in favor of preserving the death penalty, which is reserved exclusively for those guilty of the most heinous crimes.
I do have trouble, however, when those who insist on calling the death penalty a human rights issue refuse to accept that abortion too is a human rights issue. I would submit that both are, as I hope most reasonable minds would agree.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID