Compton: Win the battle, lose the war

Despite a majority of Americans showing consistent opposition to Obamacare, according to poll results from Real Clear Politics, it has been passed and signed into law. This means that 35 million more Americans are going to be insured, parents can keep their children on their insurance plans up to the age of 26 and insurance companies can no longer deny coverage for preexisting conditions.

At this point, many people who operate on talking points and emotional appeals rather than reality are sold. However, others seek more information: Sounds great, but what price do we pay to receive these benefits?

We are told we will see the largest middle class tax cut in history. Not only is it deficit neutral, but it will actually reduce the deficit by $100 billion over the next decade and more than $1 trillion in the second decade. It will also rein in waste, fraud and abuse in the system.

Anyone who will take a second to stop and think, rather than be swept along by eloquent rhetoric, can understand that this is too good to be true.

But with a media that sees no evil, hears no evil and speaks no evil when it comes to Obama, the gimmicks rule the day. Pulling off this kind of swindle makes Bernie Madoff look like an amateur.

Since when does a massive government entitlement program reduce the deficit? How can 32 million patients be added to the system without rationing care, especially at a time when doctors are already in short supply?

Is ensuring universal coverage at the expense of the entire healthcare system worth it? The system is broken, yet our government is about to guarantee 35 million more to the ranks of the insured. Obamacare isn’t going to help the uninsured. Rather, it is going to force those who already have insurance to rely on a system that is broken — essentially uninsuring the insured.

Doctors are already denying Medicaid patients and they are beginning to deny some Medicare patients as well. What is going to be different about this much bigger government program?

Add Social Security to Medicaid, Medicare, the post office, Amtrak, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and you get a track record of consistent government failure. There is no successful test case of our government running any business and making it more efficient or better quality.

But the unwavering faith the left has for the government to solve everything they deem to be a “social ill” is quite astonishing.

The audacity to pass this legislation with complete disregard for the public sentiment that was clearly against it and the manner in which it was forced through with blatant and shameless bribery and loaded with broken campaign promises will haunt the Democrats this November and for elections to come.

For many, the decision to ignore the people and vote for the 2,300 page monstrosity was a decision to walk the plank for the Obama presidency.

Democrats may have won this battle, but they are certainly losing the war.

Compton is a senior from Wichita in political science.

— Compton is a senior from Wichita in history and political science.

 

Related articles

Compton: The shrinking presidency

President Obama fails in keeping political promises.

/news/2009/sep/15/compton/

Politically Correct: The public option

Columnists weigh in on the health care debate.

/news/2009/oct/27/public-option/

McCroy: ObamaCare Gives Federal Government Too Much ...

With the recent supreme court debates about ObamaCare, we must think back ...

/news/2012/apr/03/mccroy-obamacare-gives-federal-government-too-much/

Cohen: Healthcare debate represents a problem with ...

Bitter battle between parties stands in the way of government efficiency.

/news/2010/mar/29/cohen-healthcare/

Corrigan: ObamaCare not right for all

ObamaCare puts into question the power of the federal government, and suggests ...

/news/2012/mar/30/corrigan-obamacare-not-right-all/

/comments/cr/33/15341/#c12153

A guide to the proposed health care ...

A look at the health care bills that are being passed around ...

/news/2009/dec/03/news-health-care/

Two sides of healthcare

Health insurance is one of the major issues this year.

/news/2008/nov/03/two_sides_healthcare/

Katz: Rein in insurance companies for health ...

Insurance companies' abuse American's.

/news/2010/mar/11/katz-reign-insurance-companies-health-care-reform/

Compton: Politics inspire rumination

Columnist shares conservative view of recent events.

/news/2009/dec/02/compton-politics-inspire-rumination/

Thompson: Democrats’ reform needs strength

President Obama’s healthcare reform pushes for momentum with help from unexpected endorsements.

/news/2009/sep/23/thompson_democrats_reform_needs_strength/

Compton: The arrogance of power

Obama's failure to see his weaknesses is a problem for Democrats.

/news/2010/jan/28/compton-arrogance/

Cohen: Public option opponents’ ideas lack substance

The 'liberal loudmouth' explains why he believes public healthcare isn't so bad.

/news/2009/aug/20/public_option_opponents_ideas_lack_substance/

Forum teaches students about American health coverage

Students talked about their experiences regarding insurance companies and what must be ...

/news/2008/mar/06/insurance/

Sebelius may oversee Medicare, Medicaid

Mark Parkinson will be Kansas’ governor if Sebelius accepts position as secretary ...

/news/2009/mar/02/sebelius/

McCroy: Obama's budget spells bad news

The new budget proposed by President Obama isn't going to do much ...

/news/2012/feb/20/mccroy-obamas-budget-spells/

Governor’s departure poses problems

Sebelius’ acceptance of HHS secretary leaves Kansas’ future and Obama’s health care ...

/news/2009/mar/03/governors_departure/

Politically Correct: Reviewing Obama's budget proposal

Three panelists sound off on Obama's proposed budget for the 2011 fiscal ...

/news/2010/feb/05/politically-correct-/

Brinker: The great American rant

Everyone is angry, but where are the fingers really pointing?

/news/2010/feb/03/brinker-great/

Editorial: Hospital benefits support gay rights

President Obama extended patient rights rights to gay men and women

/news/2010/apr/28/hospital-benefits-support-gay-rights/

Editorial: Health care reform and students

Students should consider impact of health care legislation.

/news/2009/nov/16/editorial-health-care-reform-and-students/

Letter to the Editor: Healthcare from the ...

Americans should remember the principles set forth by Founding Fathers in evaluating ...

/news/2010/mar/23/letter-editor/

Robinson: Health care law not best option ...

New health law falls short of expectations.

/news/2010/oct/05/robinson-health-care-law-not-best-option-uninsured/

Letter: Democrats don't play transparent

Before you blame Republicans for America's problems, look at what Democrats have ...

/news/2011/sep/25/letter-democrats-dont-play-transparent/

/comments/cr/33/12136/#c8827

Scott: Obama has shown courage

Obama may be starting to resemble Rodney Dangerfield.

/news/2010/nov/01/scott-obama-has-shown-courage/

Editorial: Boyda has shown genuine progress

/news/2008/oct/29/editorial_boyda_has_shown_genuine_progress/

Title X funding up in the air

A proposed bill would cut $317 million in reproductive health care and ...

/news/2011/apr/07/title-x-funding-air/

Contributed column: Get busy on health care

Public preference absent in news commentary on health care.

/news/2009/nov/20/contributed-column-health-care/

/comments/cr/33/12271/#c8949

Students contemplate Sebelius’ future

Obama aides say Kansas governor might be next Health and Human Services ...

/news/2009/feb/23/sebelius/

Editorial: Sebelius’ experience will help as Secretary ...

The governor will do more good in Washington than she could have ...

/news/2009/mar/09/editorial_sebelius/

Soener: Americans must seek new financial reform ...

Debate over the debt-ceiling has Americans looking at their pocketbooks and wondering ...

/news/2011/jul/13/soener-americans-must-seek-new-financial-reform-ex/

Corrigan: Using class warfare in politics

The left often uses class warfare in politics to win elections.

/news/2012/feb/13/corrigan-using-class-warfare-politics/

Politically Correct: The ethics of torture tactics

Our panelists offer their opinions on whether torture should be permitted in ...

/news/2010/mar/05/politically-correct/

Holtz: French protests highlight American political apathy

Do Americans no longer feel capable of making a difference?

/news/2010/jun/29/holtz-french-protests-highlight-american-political/

Insurance essential but often unaffordable

Students without health coverage hope for changes in policy.

/news/2009/dec/03/news-insurance/

/comments/cr/33/11458/#c8084

Compton: Obama fails to bring post racial ...

After one year in office, issues of race still remain prevalent for ...

/news/2010/jan/20/compton-obama/

Katz: Still waiting for promised changes to ...

Despite economic crisis, regulations on financial institutions still too lax

/news/2010/jan/20/katz-still/

Comments

Hoveround has been helping people regain their mobility for over 17 years and we want to help you get your independence back. We believe that everyone should be free to get out and explore the world. We can send you a complimentary no-obligation information kit with DVD contact us at http://bit.ly/cNup47

This is a great place to advertise the Hoveround!

If you think Madoff ran a huge scam, Amway has ripped off millions of people for several decades, to the tune of 10s of billions of dollars.

Amway is a scam, and here's why: Amway pays out as little money as they can get away with, so they support the higher level IBOs ripping off their downline via the tool scam.

As a result, about 99% of IBOs operate at a net loss, while the top 1% make several TIMES more from their Amway tool scam than from the Amway products. This was made illegal in the UK in 2008, but our FTC is unable to pull their heads out of their butts to stop it here.

Read about it on this website: http://thenetprofitgroup.yolasite.com and forward the information to everyone you know, so they don't get scammed.

The liberals on here never provide evidence either, dude. It's an op/ed.

Umm...the liberals did provide evidence, which was confirmed by the Congressional Budget Office. Mr. Compton cited this evidence before deciding he just doesn't believe in it. That's fine--if the facts don't fit your beliefs, don't believe in those facts.

For evidence you have to connect the dots; the CBO is only concerned with the cost not the constitutionality. Their INITIAL report says that the cost of the bill will come in under 1 trillion dollars and save 138 billion over the FIRST decade. It was designed to come up with those numbers because this is what they could not or would not report on; the first four years of the decade would be about collecting taxes to offset the following six years of benefits. There are next to no benefits paid for by government the first four years. Any benefits are MANDATED by the government to be picked up by the insurance companies. If you average out the entire ten years and compare it to the following ten years then the bill bust the bank by being over 1 trillion dollars. This was reported by the CBO in a follow up report and they noted that a "fix" was necessary to make things work. The "doctor fix" was required to be added to the bill and the cost of that was 250 billion dollars. So the final cost of the bill is more like 1.3 trillion dollars and that is called a budget buster. FYI the CBO has never got one of these things right. They always miss on the downside so expect this bill to cost a few trillion dollars. Do you happen to have that money on you? Better hope so because you will be paying for it for the next 60 years.

Sign in to comment