Quick, think about the news headlines of the summer. We have a new country: the Republic of South Sudan; the GOP battle for the Republican Presidential nomination has begun in earnest; our military involvement in Libya has intensified. These events continue to capture our attention through the media, even though at times we may attempt to shut them out.
Today, more than ever, we can specifically choose the news reports we follow daily. Flipping through a newspaper or magazine, we can look over anything we’re not interested in and read more about what we are. Television shows and news channels can be easily streamed over the web, and we have complete control over what we want to watch. Tiny blurbs on social media tempt us into clicking attached links to read more. In the end, we have the power to spend our time specifically on whatever we wish.
This barrage of blurbs is increasingly becoming a source of entertainment. The subjects of these news stories can at times seem to exist as pure sideshows, but we forget very easily that these landmark events affect the lives of others much more than we realize.
A five-minute reading about the new same-sex marriage law in New York may be pleasant and enlightening, but its ramifications for couples who have lived in the state for years and can now marry the love of their lives are profound.
Images of famine in Somalia may be shocking and unpleasant, but it’s not like images can ever be forced upon anyone. Just as easily as the image is available, it is just as easy to click out of it and immediately forget about its impact.
Elders and peers constantly remind us to “take a walk in another person’s shoes” when we are quick to make judgmental statements about others with a limited amount of knowledge at our disposal. I couldn’t even count the number of people I saw on social media making snap judgments about their approval or disapproval of the debt limit deal (or, with even less sensitivity, the Casey Anthony trial), even though they knew a bare minimum about the in’s and out’s of these events and were possibly even pre-disposed to an opinion because of biased “news” anchors.
We are invited to make these judgments, though, because of how the news is normally fed to us without us realizing its impact. By allowing ourselves access to more news, less of our time may be devoted to reading through each event one-by-one. This may lead to an even greater misunderstanding of the issues at large. One way to overcome any sort of these incorrect assumptions is to open up our awareness to the fact that there is no simple way of understanding everything the media is offering us.
Through that awareness, as I am discovering today, there was never really a moment when not much was “going on.” All that changes is our realization that we can constantly further our understanding of the world and all the complex events that happen on it.
After that, the summer seems practically mild in comparison.
—Brett Salsbury is a senior in English, History of Art, and Global and International Studies from Chapman.
Salsbury: The problem with technology
Even with all its benefits, technology has its downsides.
Boultinghouse: A little discomfort can be a ...
The media should show reality-- but use a little judgment.
Salsbury: Rational or not, some things, and ...
Students rarely recognize how odd some of our culture's customs are.
Salsbury: Change isn't necessarily improvement
With changes in technology, enjoy the journey.
Salsbury:Imagining the United States without the military
Costa Rica doesn't have a military and seems to be doing just ...
Salsbury: College is a gift not a ...
Don't complain about being at college.
Salsbury: Hunger Games provide insight on society
The function of dystopian novels, as in "The Hunger Games," is often ...
Salsbury: Art has many different mediums
Art isn't necessarily supposed to be pretty.
What in the world
Blog: Is News Disappearing?
Why Have College Students Stopped Reading the News?
Ho: No excuses for being uninformed
Students should be more socially and politically aware.
Talk back: The 2008 Olympic Games in ...
What students say vs. what we say.
Salsbury: Hope for arts
The Kauffman Center for Performing Arts brings a new dimension of entertainment ...
Poetic license
Find the ordinary extraordinary in easily and accessible everyday poetry.
Salsbury: Graduation proves to be better than ...
With graduation right around the corner, don't let uncertainty bring you down.
CITIZEN DOLPH: A rare look at the ...
You may not recognize his name, but Dolph Simons Jr., chairman of ...
Spencer showcase examines photography in the digital ...
Interactive exhibition allows visitors to be a photo editor for the day.
Blackmon: International events shed light on national ...
Well informed students look at all the news, including international events.
Morning Brew: SEC policy still restrictive
Restrictions on tweeting, blogging and photo use mean the conference — not ...
Al Jazeera English chief discusses U.S. media
Will Stebbins answers questions about international perspective and American news coverage.
American journalism all fluff, no substance
Case for the imperfect body
Artist speaks about his full-body casts and self image.
Garrison: Feedback always welcome
Comments and suggestions to journalists are encouraged.
Earles: Diet pills not to blame for ...
I’m just sick of everyone blaming the media for issues that we ...
Editorial: Students should support downtown businesses
Local companies need patronage to stay afloat.
Letter: Where is the news coverage about ...
Facebook drama
Why we act and interact online.
Salsbury: Embracing idiosyncrasies forms individuals
A large part of appreciating your own individuality comes from learning from ...
The Beak: Debut edition, with Naismith, Maddow, ...
On-campus news-you-can-use from our latest experiment, a daily blog.
A point of contention: The long and ...
Ryan: Small-time musicians need your ‘Band Aid’
Ditch the iPod and go out for some live music.
Goble: Every dog has its day, even ...
This particular story symbolized a defiant victory for the average American, a ...
For multicultural sororities, the rush continues
Roesler: Believing in KU Football
Roesler discusses the excitement for KU Football and the hope for another ...
Editorial: ECM earns deserved recognition
Ecumenical Christian Ministries has been a haven for a variety of people ...
Blog: Basic Training
Reporter Kelly Stroda is spending six days at Ft. Leavenworth and Ft. ...
Giddens charged with battery
Blakeborough: Japanese lives should matter more than ...
Tragedy in Japan trumps weather reports in California.
Out of the Dark
The worst questions are the ones without answers
Editorial: Lessons learned from athletes' fight
Altercations shine a negative light on the University.

From left: Kimberlee Hinkle, Libby Johnson and Hannah ...
1 comment
Kansas Jayhawk fans hold aloft a reproduction of ...
2 comments
Erin Saupe, a Ph.D. student from St. Cloud, ...
1 comment
0 comments
Armed robbers continue to threaten.
3 comments
Comments
Salsbury: A blurb is not enough
As someone who has been around a little bit I can say that attention spans are getting shorter. Back in the old days I guy had to stand next to the TV to channel surf. He would change the channel, wait about 10-15 seconds to see what was on, and then on to the new channel. To check the whole dial took about a minute. We only had about five channels in those days. Today a guy spends about 1.3 seconds per channel (myself included) and we can run the 200 channels in a couple of minutes. We automatically go right by the Shopping Channel (unless it is sex toy night) and Soap channels to save time.
Even in the classroom we are pushed to go faster and spend less time with the subject. We now skim books instead of read them. I would sit still for a hour at a time and read a hundred pages (I read really fast or used to). Now we hit the highlights.
We have so much information available on the Internet we can't spend any real time with one thing (porn not included) and if we did spend so much time on the computer then we have a problem.
We still have the capability to adjust. I had a friend who sit on a jury or a capital murder trial a couple of years ago. She looked at the Kasey Anthony trial and said a week ahead of time that the evidence was not there. Same thing for other things in our lives. My thing is politics and I do spend hours keeping up with all the little events. I guess some people can discuss football for hours but, I have to point out that, the Chiefs can't raise your taxes and the Royals can't declare war (that would require an offense).
It is up to each of us whether or not we succumb to the times. Like yoga or meditation we just have to take the time.
Salsbury: A blurb is not enough
Mister Salsbury, I feel you're overgeneralizing about how people disseminate information. Many pour rigorously over any data they can find to an intimate level, about as much as those who consign themselves to the "blurbs" of which you speak.
You are right in that we have more access to information than ever before, but I feel that access has more positives that this article didn't mention. In the past, America was held in the grip of yellow journalism - the Spanish-American War comes to mind. The "blurb" culture then is not constrained to Generation Y - historian Michael Roberts said that, "Newspaper reporters and readers of the 1890s were much less concerned with distinguishing among fact-based reporting, opinion, and literature" (to pull from Wikipedia). I grow tired of this false nostalgia fostered by some (such as the commenter above) that insinuates that modern times are somehow inferior to earlier eras, just as tired as I am when I hear the wonders of modern times trumpeted over those "darker, savager eras." Please. Nothing is new under the sun. But I digress.
What I'm saying is, I'm confused by this article's thesis. That our times should read more? That's a generalization, and an inaccurate one at that. That our times should care more about the world? Humanity has never cared to begin with and it's not about to start caring more - how else can you explain colonialism, slavery, genocide, persecution? What exactly, Mr Salsbury, is your call to action?
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID