Cohen: ‘Walk-and-talking’ awkward for all
Student Senate canvassing is annoying but necessary.
By Ben Cohen
Tuesday, April 15th, 2008
Editor’s note: Cohen is a member of ConnectKU in addition to writing a bi-weekly column for the Kansan.
Some people call it “drawing blood.” Some people call it “walk-and-stalking.” Some people just call it the reason they hate Student Senate.
Those of us who commit the act just call it a necessary evil.
Coalition members pass out fliers to every single person we see, following them to the ends of the earth (or at least campus), telling them why they should vote for us.
For a week every spring, Senate coalitions flood Wescoe Beach and then the rest of campus. Coalition members pass out fliers to every single person we see, following them to the ends of the earth (or at least campus), telling them why they should vote for us.
I admit that I’ve taken part in this for the past three years. The term those of us who run for Senate apply to the practice of harassing uninterested students is “walk-and-talking,” a single letter separate from one of the previously mentioned terms.
Very few of the people who run, regardless of partisan affiliation, honestly enjoy doing this. One can get desperate when trying to be elected by thousands of strangers, and after a while, any idea sounds like a good one.
The mindset behind walk-and-talking is that it leaves no stone unturned when searching for people who may be interested in supporting your coalition.
The last week before the polls open, when we are allowed to do this, is a period of incredible uncertainty and anxiety to all involved. The members of the various coalitions pour their souls into those Senate campaigns that clog campus for a few weeks every year.
Some years, it is more effective than others.
I ran twice with the Delta Force coalition and saw two radically different results based on how much we engaged in walk-and-talking. One year, it was discouraged among members of the coalition, and although a fair amount of people were elected, we didn’t do all that well.
The next year we reversed directions and did it constantly. The coalition did better, at least in regards to how it stacked up to its competition when the votes were tallied, but that election had a voter turnout that was so low it was a little embarrassing to all involved.
Last Thursday marked the end of the campaign season, which pitted United Students, Students of Liberty and ConnectKU against each other. The election had a significantly better turnout, with around 17 percent of students voting, as opposed to the previous year’s 12 percent.
I was elected to Senate for the first time by something greater than a five-person committee.
This year also saw more people engaging in walk-and-talk. I get the idea from seeing this voter increase that people are enthusiastic about the various coalitions’ ideas, things like putting up wind turbines on campus, making Gmail KU’s new e-mail system or making it easier to use the Union parking garage.
But maybe, just maybe, people are getting used to seeing the coalitions roaming campus to the point that they are starting to warm to it.
That is reassuring because of how much it is pushed on candidates that this is the way to be elected. People have always complained about how annoying walk-and-talking is.
The annoyance is understandable, even from the perspective of somebody who has engaged in it for a few years now.
Everyone who participates in Student Senate elections knows how it looks when we crowd campus and beg you to listen to our rants about how we will bring about world peace and sunshine and puppy dogs if you’ll vote for us.
It is about as awkward for us to do as it is for you to politely listen and nod at appropriate times. All we ask is that you don’t hold it against us the rest of the year.
Cohen is a Topeka junior in political science.
Discussion
All comments are moderated by Kansan.com staff. For our full user policy, click here.
Ben Cohen is starting to understand the necessity of the walk and talk.
Amazing. :)
It truly is the best chance for senators to talk to their fellow students. Otherwise, they only end up talking to specific groups on campus, instead of the totality. I'm of the opinion that Senate should do a full day of walk-and-talking in the fall, so as to inform students of the services they can take advantage of without the ulterior motive of getting themselves elected.
But, what can I say, I'm a dreamer.
I normally don't comment on any stories, let alone my own, but Nolan Jones, where would the world be without you?
You comment all the time, right, I love lamp?
Literally loling here. :)
Oh, that's not even funny.
Who am I kidding? Yes it is.
Oh, and just FYI to people: I'm not a sophomore in pre-journalism. I'm a junior in Poli-Sci.
Fixed it for you, Ben.
Thank ya', sir.
Actually, the walk and stalk is not always the best solution. During Delta Force 5 in 2001, it was discouraged to the point that some even held sandwich boards that said "End Voter Harassment". The result was a narrow DF victory. In fact, during most elections I have seen the walk and stalk do nothing but suppress voter turnout. The practice does such a great job of annoying the average student that turnouts remain roughly between 4,000-5,000 students and the same groups win each year as a result. However, I cannot say one way or another that walk and stalk proportionately increases or decreases one's chances of obtaining office, but it sure does a great job of annoying the entire campus.
I would agree with both points-
Walking and talking does give senators the opportunity to interact with the entire student body. During campaign season I talk to quite a few folks who "didn't know about student" senate, or didn't know about the elections. It's a great way to hear ideas from students as well.
However, for every student that is informed, 3 more are annoyed by our presence. They refuse to vote out of spite for the people interrupting their walk on campus. This tactic has never been all that successful, and I have received countless complaints from my friends about how irritating "active campaigning" is, or how they avoid wescoe beach during elections week so they won't be bothered. Of course, these people refuse to vote no matter how many times I tell them to.
Senators, I am asking you to come up with a better solution than trying to convince apathetic voters that they should care by annoying the crap out of them. It's not working. Perhaps you should make bolder platform issues. This year's platforms were better than last year's, but still could have been alot better. Take the important issues head on. Don't let the challenge of bureaucracy get in the way, and don't let anyone tell you you can't do something great through senate. Do this, and I promise you you will not need to active campaign at all.
Perhaps a second way to get people excited is to table in the fall. Currently nobody hears about student senate except in the spring. Senators love to table, and getting them out to interact with the student body in the fall would be a great way to keep students excited and informed about student senate.
The ability to find a solution to this issue is almost impossible. However, I still remember when people would just grad literature from each coalition and then carry it with them until the elections were over. I saw some pretty messy handbills toward the end, but I did have to tip my cap to this interesting approach.
Share your 2¢
Requires free registration.