Listen, in defense of the liberal-biased media, they don't have two brain cells to rub together. They wouldn't know a memorial from a kegstand, and they'll defend their "right" to be offensive right up until the point at which it becomes an actual defense, with something at stake. That's when the real heroes appear. They can keep trashing conservatives, but in the end that's who they'll call for help. You already mentioned the half-baked backhanded apology, and the "1st amendment!" meme that "journalists" spout, but it still bears repeating that ɜɽᵼʰɯ.

Dean LeeRoy Broyles, Malcolm James Brumwell, Sam Bernard Bruner, Frank J. Buck, Henry Siddon Bunting, Robert Luther Burchinal, Howard Reynolds Burnett, Curtis Andrew Burton, Ernest William Bye, Kendall Carl Campbell, Paul Alexander Cannady Sr., Alvin George Carsten, Donald Houston Caylor, Richard Payne Chenoweth, Robert Eugene Chilson, Russell Junior Chitwood, Raymond Lewis Clapper, Dean Edward Cochran, Robert Langden Coleman, Paul Robert Conway, Joseph Dillard Conwill, James Eugene Cook, Samuel Donald Coulter, George T. Cronemeyer, Robert Thomas Crowder, Robert James Crutcher, Joseph Junior Dague, Dean Herbert Dalton, Nolan James Day, Grover H. Delinger, Foster Leonard Dennis, John Kingsbury Detwiler, James Hungate Dodderidge, Caryl John "Jack" Dodds Jr., Victor Donald Dolecek, Mary Elizabeth "Bess" Doty, Paul Francis Dunham, Morel Francis Dunham, John Taylor Dyatt, Lance Carroll Dyer, Fred Curry Eberhardt, Raymond Albert Eberhart, Charles Ansel Eckert, Daniel Frank Elam, Donald Lee Evans, John Dee Ewers, Allan Roderick Ewing, Leonard E. Fasholtz, Keith Hilton Fedde, James Hapgood Ferguson, Herbert Stewart Finney, Rodney Leroy Ford, Keith C. Foster, Holmes Chiles Fowler, John Brandon Franks, Thomas Samuel Freeman, Raymond Lester Friedson ,R. Earl Fromm, Don Bernard Fullmer, Arthur Oakland Furfey, Verne Leroy Gibb, Julius Thomas Gibson Jr., Donald Deal Gill, John Richard Goheen, John Burton Goins, William Herman Graves, John James Green, John Joseph Griffin Jr., Norman Bertrand Griggs,

Calton B. Grissom Jr. Harold Lynn Hackler Fred Scott Hall Fred. C. Hamilton William McAdoo Hanna Kenneth Wayne Harley Melvin Ray Hartley Jr. James Samuel Hartzell Herman Heubner Hauck Robert Albert Haynes Darl Jay Heffelbower Donald Dean Heitman John Adams Hettinger Robert Lee Hoisington Bernard David Hotchkiss Dean Howard Howell Bernice Francis Humphrey Frederick George Humphrey Thomas Pitt Hunter Jr. Francis V. Huycke Robert Ernest Innis Robert Keith Jelinek William Lawrence Jepson Harold Adelbert Jimerson Lawrence R. Johnston William Pilcher Johnston Charles Osburn Jordan John Dillman Keeling Robert Webster Kehr Charles Norton Kelley Kenneth Lee Kelly Hillis Alan Kennard Leland White Kesler Jr. Deane Warren Kiefer Jack Kinell William Marshall Knight George Richard Koehler Jr. Kemper Jay Kost Wilber Paul Kroeker George Owen Kunkle Francis Claude Laird Joe Ralph Laird Fred Wrightman Lake Jr. Vernon Jay Landon Paul Albert Lark Daniel Seward LeShelle Jack Marchant Lee James Robert Lewis Solon Russell Lindsey Alfred Daniel Linley. Lawrence Sidney Smythe Linscott Jr. Ernest Alvin Lombard G. Max Louk Benjamin L. Love James Keith Loveless Earl George Lowe Jr. Lynn Meredith Mahannah Robert John Marshall Howard Allen Martin Robert Lester Mathews John Bridger Mayhugh Curtis John McCoy Jr. William Weldon McCrum Lawrence Gene McGinnis Stanley Whiteford McLeod James Leslie McNaughton Marian McShea Norman Richard Meeks Walter William Meininger Robert Clarence Mitschele Glen Tucker Mize Arthur Junior Moody Ralph E. "Red" Morrison Johnny "Jack" Musselman Raymond Tardin Napier Charles Wayne Nees Eugene Harold Nirdlinger Jack Noble Jr. John Herman Nuttmann P. Joseph O'Connor Jr. Robert Eugene Ode Frank Woodrow O'Flaherty Edward Kern Olsen Stanley Randolph Olson Bert L. Overcash Jr.

Stanley Leach Paine George Milton Paris Francis Holmes Paronto Elmo Lemont Patterson Charles Edwin Paxton Jo Wade Payne Jr. John Elliott Penner Neil Pennington Otis Oscar Perkins Herbert Mathias Peters John Starks Phillips William Wilson Phillips Jr. Charles Franklin Pierson John Albert Pierson Harold C. Place Albert Plotkin Donald Boyd Pollom Fred Rollin Powell William Samuel Prout John Thomas Puckett Vernon John Razak Glessner Woodrow Reimer James Andrew Reinhart Jr. Earl Boice Reynolds Dean Haberly Rice James Clark Richardson Browder A. Richmond Jr. Deane E. Richmond Floyd Lewis Riederer Carroll G. Riggs John Rolland Riisoe Irvin Edmund Rink Clarence Junior Robinson Walter Willard Rodgers Hal Russell Ruppenthal Herbert Kazoo Sadayasu Lloyd Irvin Savely Howard Iden Schlingloff James Edward Seibel William Wilson Seitz Rodney Walden Seufridge Howard Eugene Sellards Abe Shafer III Evan Homer Shaible Robert Jackson Siddons Niles Raymond Siebert Francis Bernard Smith Jr. Glen Bradley Smith James Cunningham Smith Raymond Tracy Smith Glenn Howard Soellner John Glenn Somers Jr. John Burroughs Stahl Wayne Clifford Steele Paul Ramsey Stephens John Wheless Stephenson Thomas Grier Stewart Vern V. Stewart Raymond C. Stiles Robert Ellsworth Stoddard Lawrence Iver Stoland Elmer Jackson Stone Thomas William Stone John Elmer Strand James Phillip Stratton Jean Thomas Henry Foxall Thorne Charles Raymond Toberen James Coleman Traw Robert Emery Trekell Wallace Augustine Trued John Peter Van Rixoort Francis Montgomery Veatch Pierce Leroy Veith Walter Harold Verbanic Cranston Gorgon Vincent Harold DuMont Waldecker Victor Griesa Walling Joseph Edwin Walsh Jr. William Edward Walter John W. Waterbury Jr. Lucien Andrew Watkins William Louis Weber Ray Gunther Wenzel Chevey Schaeffer White Robert William Whitehead Fred Ordway Wickham Albert Joseph Wieland Jr. Joe Lawrence Wieland Clyde Williams Robert Samuel Wilson Gilbert Leslie Worley Jr. Ralph Milton Wyatt John Henry Yoder Paul Bernard Young Herman H. Ziegenbusch James Munroe Zoellner

Since these men and women don't have a voice, I've decided to list their names here, in the hope that we will all remember those brave men and women from KU who paid the ultimate price for the freedoms we so clearly enjoy today.

Thanks for reminding us, em1.

I am also apalled by what was done by the UDK at our WWII memorial. However, I am also offended that the graphic nature of the photos were allowed regardless of where they were taken. The UDK became playboy, but instead of having to seek out a copy of the UDK like playboy does they give it out to everyone on campus. I really hope the staff learned a lesson but I really don't think its going to change anything, and that is truly sad.

Sorry folks, offensive material is protected by the constitution. I understand that a country like Iran might agree with you and ban that type of material. Perhaps you should live there if you don't like our freedoms.

That is not the point. The point is, that you are descecrating the memorial to those who GAVE YOU THOSE FREEDOMS. Had the military not succeded in WWII, we would be under Japanese emperial rule or the Nazi regieme and have no freedoms in the first place (the Japanese did think they were a superior race and crushed those against them).

This country could easily become a great country again if people only put the country first, instead the United States of America is quickly becoming the Me First America. "I have this right, and I have that right. No one else matters but me." How sad. If that was the majority attitude in the 1770's we would be British right now.

We should all feel sorry for lingup_the_grammar_robot. He obviously was never able to play sports as a child. If he had, he would know that, while you have every right to try to score every goal on your own, it is better for the team to swallow your pride and pass the ball to someone else and let them actually score a point. His team will always lose.

cath0830: "The point is, that you are descecrating the memorial to those who GAVE YOU THOSE FREEDOMS. Had the military not succeded in WWII, we would be under Japanese emperial rule or the Nazi regieme and have no freedoms in the first place (the Japanese did think they were a superior race and crushed those against them)."

This makes no sense. We shouldn't have freedom of speech because the people who gave us this freedom (and I don't agree with your analysis there) kept us from not having freedom of speech?
The memorial was not desecrated. This is your opinion which you are entitled to have and to write about. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean someone shouldn't have the right to do it. I'm offended by your shallow view that WWII vets GAVE ME MY FREEDOMS but I won't scream that you shouldn't be able to express your opinion, no matter how naive.

Alright. If my view is SO shallow........ Who gave you those freedoms? They didn't just come about. They don't still stand because those vets sat back and didn't do anything whant the US was attacked, preventing our being taken over by a facist empire.

desecrate transitive verb meaning: 1. to violate the sanctity of. 2. to treat disrespectfully, irreverently, or outrageously. Ask the WWII vets what they think of Sex on the Hill. They will tell you differently.

One of the things that make America great is our ability to make choices. I have several rights that I CHOOSE not to use on a daily basis. Just because I have the right to do something doesn't mean I have to run right out and do it. There are many people that are holding back right now, I can guarantee that.

So, they fought for those freedoms, and yet the Kansan should feel guilty for taking advantage of them? Then what was the point of the sacrifices made by the people the Campanille is dedicated to?

This is a respect issue. Respect goes both ways. Does no one understand the meaning of respect and desecrate anymore? I was taught to respect things as a child, not necessarily agree with them. Respect your elders, even if it's in the form of a statue. Forget the fact that public nudity is illegal, committing lude acts (sex) in public is illegal. The public went crazy mad when an American Idol contestant took "racy" pictures of herself in front of a WWII memorial in 2007, and she wasn't even having sex. No one could see this outcry coming after that?

Of course, that trashy stuff is protected speech, but just because you CAN say it doesn't mean you ought to. "Sex on the Hill" was designed to be shocking and titilating and to "prove" that the UDK is "holding the line" and "bearing up the Standard" for Free Speech. Then when people complained, the staff could preen and speechify about their right to free speech. Baloney. It was offensive and unnecessary and in poor taste. The university paper ought to hold itself up to higher standards than that. If you want to make a stand for free speech, make it for a good reason. The ability to print pictures of people having sex just because you can isn't a good reason. Disrespecting the Memorial isn't a good reason.

Grow up.

What a bunch of fascists! The point has nothing to do with respect, dececration or world war 2 vets. There is a thing called freedom of speech. If you don't like it, complain. But don't go around saying they don't have the right to offend you. Grow up. There are plenty of vets who are glad they fought for my right to offend.

I thought liberals were supposed to have an open mind, even if they didn't agree with it. This is completely about respect. Open your mind. Just because you want a fight, doesn't mean there is one. ALL veterans are glad that they fight and die for your rights. We are offended that you CHOOSE to exercise your rights in a way that disrespects us. People who won't fight for our country should respect those that do and did, since we respect you enough to die for you.

You're right. I'm a facist. And so is anyone that respects and honors those who have gone before.

And this completely has to do with respect. Would you disrespect your dead grandmother by having sex on her grave and then post pictures of it everywhere? I would hope not. Why? Human decency.

They fought for the defense of this country. That defense of our constitution, of our bill of rights. One of those being freedom of speech. That freedom for you guys to yell and bicker and argue among each other over whether or not they would or would not approve or be offended of something. But the basic fact is, you both have the right to keep a closed mind, that's what those bill of rights guaranteed. I hope that this continues for you both to be bitter and close minded because if that is so then our rights are still there, those rights that anybody should be able to exercise however and wherever they want.

well... they weren't really having sex...

but i wonder how many people actually have. i've heard it is a pretty popular spot.

I just want to point out that criticizing the entire staff of the paper is unfair. Most of the people who work at The Kansan knew nothing about the upcoming issue of Sex on the Hill and those people don't deserve to be grouped with 10 people on staff who did know.

I don't think anyone is being fascist here, really.

There is a difference between pointing out that something is disrespectful/shouldn't have been published and saying that speech like this should be banned. I haven't really heard anyone call for the latter.

However, I have heard people call for the banning of offensive photographs brought on campus by anti-abortion groups.

When did the act of sex become something with such a negative connotation?

I agree completely with you Ms. Chambers, and I hope if you aren't connected with the sex on the hill edition, you don't feel that you're under the fire as much so to speak.

It is unfortunate in some ways, but a fact of life, that many times the carelessness or blatent mistakes of a few make many others look bad. Case in point the recent plagerizer at the NYT who got fired a couple years ago, and made the whole paper look less credible. It sucks, but that whole organization took a hit for what was really just an individual problem in a lot of ways, and in every other way was limited to very few others who knew about the problem. Addtionally, I'm not allowed to call out individuals in an editorial piece, so I address the paper as a whole. I as an individual understand that some at the UDK may be opposed to this issue for a number of reasons, and I certainly respect that.